Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16862

Re: python-xarray test failures

From Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: python-xarray test failures
Date 2025-04-24 09:10 +0200
Message-ID <KEYSB-fPfM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <KDe5s-eGMI-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <KE0D7-fcKA-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Alastair,

It seems to be fine in experimental (though it is only debci-tested on
amd64 and arm64), so please do go ahead and upload -4 to unstable.
You don't need to request an unblock at this stage; see
https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html#soft

Best wishes,

   Julian

On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 03:39:21PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> H Anathanu
> 
> A patch to fix this has just been uploaded. Once it is safely tested in
> experimental,   I'll request an unblock.
> 
> There was somehow a buggy -2 upload that missed the actual patch in d/rules
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Alastair
> 
> On 19/04/2025 11:56, Ananthu C V wrote:
> > Hi Alastair,
> > 
> > python-xarray currently reports several test failures[0]. If the package
> > migrates to testing, it'd fix #1100293[1] which otherwise could cause a lot
> > of AUTORM.
> > 
> > The test failures are on the 32bit archs (armel, armhf, and i386), as well as
> > s390x. The failures on 32bit archs don't look serious to me as they look like
> > either intended for 64bit, or false negatives. In that regard, I have a patch
> > that'd disable those failing tests conditionally on 32bit archs[2]. I can't,
> > however, push it to the team repo since it looks like the changes for the
> > previous upload (as well as the debian tags for the last two uploads) was
> > not pushed. If my patch seems reasonable to you, I can push it and do a team
> > upload once you push your changes to the repo, or add an MR if you'd prefer that.
> > 
> > As for the test failures on s390x, that comes from uninstallable build-depends
> > which tracks down to magics++ not building on s390x[3] (and other archs). So
> > either that needs to be fixed, or python-xarray and rdeps have to drop s390x.
> > 
> > [0] https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/python-xarray/
> > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100293
> > [2] https://salsa.debian.org/weepingclown/python-xarray/-/commit/23bb201a0ac7ddab59e368cd342516d90ef8e47a
> > [3] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=magics%2B%2B
> > 
> -- 
> Alastair McKinstry,
> GPG: 82383CE9165B347C787081A2CBE6BB4E5D9AD3A5
> e: alastair@mckinstry.ie, im: @alastair:mckinstry.ie @amckinstry@mastodon.ie
> 
> Commander Vimes didn’t like the phrase “The innocent have nothing to fear,”
>  believing the innocent had everything to fear, mostly from the guilty but in the longer term
>  even more from those who say things like “The innocent have nothing to fear.”
>  - T. Pratchett, Snuff
> 
> 


   Julian

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

python-xarray test failures Ananthu C V <weepingclown@debian.org> - 2025-04-19 13:00 +0200
  Re: python-xarray test failures Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@debian.org> - 2025-04-21 16:50 +0200
    Re: python-xarray test failures Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2025-04-24 09:10 +0200
      Re: python-xarray test failures Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@debian.org> - 2025-04-24 10:30 +0200
        Re: python-xarray test failures Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2025-04-28 08:20 +0200
          Re: python-xarray test failures Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@debian.org> - 2025-04-28 13:20 +0200
            Re: python-xarray test failures Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2025-04-28 18:10 +0200

csiph-web