Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16528

Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy?

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Xiyue Deng <manphiz@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy?
Date Thu, 05 Dec 2024 05:10:01 +0100
Message-ID <JQblD-dPCa-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <JP4Pf-d7mR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <JPm9r-dijr-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JPriO-dloo-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <JPFOO-dvqP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <JPTI5-dEB8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JQafT-dOFA-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Dec 5 04:03:23 2024
Old-Return-Path <manphiz@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-12.199 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5.5
X-Gm-Message-State AOJu0YziENB7jdznwOHiqiGuupx90dudbtRp2apHC3lDZwJ//a926A3f 5o0yFtSlF5GGKq3qwTLfwmFufc8Lo3XZLZNJ9RuFvp7qB6OvBPy9zhovmfBBJ/Y=
X-Gm-Gg ASbGncvc0nDbl3ZBxHut5Qqg+QYMxWnu5O7m8bdiHZCVcmbM0qG1ddnUVqHaMjrCCTW pS9DzEXYHj8R5ug6yKUJ8MESntz4kyVqffbDRkpR3sqysqqGuvEm3wvvjbs9ZeTf1SwUL6/Pd2n NZEpSK8eQrjMLj5i0fqRqfXdh61UHyK/NGyP68nHRhm9Ga7Ga/w4J32IUoyA4ZaySFsu/wCpbOq 2tbJKAUW4FT+NjkyC/tuR3Sqa707ioJKgqEIHv02mNuvSn0TevU7CyMfgbJzo1Z8Zl/r+EMyUqT afSW25Mi
X-Google-SMTP-Source AGHT+IHI8Im1w+WD93OHFff4SvQDqnquXaQNfQoJ8ZiCQ2Zw2GA/jIVdkKFz/i6jvj8Kbx9zeu9q1Q==
X-Received by 2002:a17:90a:39ce:b0:2ea:7bdd:f320 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2ef41bbac63mr2869215a91.1.1733371385754; Wed, 04 Dec 2024 20:03:05 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent Notmuch/0.38.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/29.4 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/22613
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87h67isrnt.fsf@debian-hx90.lan
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 66
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python@lists.debian.org, notmuch@notmuchmail.org, mailscripts@packages.debian.org, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-Date Wed, 04 Dec 2024 20:03:02 -0800
X-Original-Message-ID <87h67isrnt.fsf@debian-hx90.lan>
X-Original-References <875xo2u70p.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87ed2pu64q.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> <87v7w1qysu.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87y10wsk2d.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> <87ser3st5v.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> <87mshaoo0r.fsf@melete.silentflame.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16528

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> writes:

> Hello,
>
> On Wed 04 Dec 2024 at 01:18am -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>
>> Looks like this has nothing to do with Python version but gpgme: I have
>> tested with a snapshot of gpgme1.0 version 1.18.0-6+b1 and everything
>> works; upgrading to version 1.23.2-5 and the tests start to show the
>> same errors.  I have been trying to see what has changed from gpgme side
>> but so far nothing conclusive yet.
>>
>> On the other hand, python-pgpy may be working fine as all failures in
>> the tests are caused by using the gpgme python binding, which somehow
>> doesn't like the PGP signed message generated by python-pgpy anymore.
>
> So the bug has nothing to do with the python 3.13 transition, in fact?
>

No.  To be clear, python 3.13 + gpgme1.0 1.18.0-6+b1 works.  It should
be the change in gpgme that caused this.

> I think that means its severity should be changed.
>
> I guess you're not sure yet whether or not it should be reassigned to
> pgpme?
>

As the gpgme unit tests are passing, I'm not quite sure whether gpgme
should be in the blame, yet.  It could be that the pgpy use should be
adjusted.  I still need more time to figure this out as it's been a busy
week.  Still hope that someone more familiar with the matter can take a
look sooner than me :)

> -- 
> Sean Whitton

-- 
Regards,
Xiyue Deng

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Anyone interested in python-pgpy? Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2024-12-02 04:00 +0100
  Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy? Xiyue Deng <manphiz@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 22:30 +0100
    Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy? Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2024-12-03 04:00 +0100
      Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy? Xiyue Deng <manphiz@gmail.com> - 2024-12-03 19:30 +0100
        Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy? Xiyue Deng <manphiz@gmail.com> - 2024-12-04 10:20 +0100
          Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy? Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2024-12-05 04:00 +0100
            Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy? Xiyue Deng <manphiz@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 05:10 +0100
              Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy? Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2024-12-06 04:10 +0100
                Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy? Xiyue Deng <manphiz@gmail.com> - 2024-12-06 21:50 +0100
                Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy? Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2024-12-07 10:00 +0100
                Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy? Xiyue Deng <manphiz@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 11:30 +0100
                Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy? Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2024-12-08 02:40 +0100
                Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy? Xiyue Deng <manphiz@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 04:00 +0100
                Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy? Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2024-12-08 06:10 +0100
  Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy? Paul Boddie <paul@boddie.org.uk> - 2024-12-03 12:30 +0100

csiph-web