Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16066

Re:

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

A bit nitpicking, but I hope you have noticed the (lack of) subject. An empty
"Re:" feels really weird.

On 22/07/2024 21:06, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 12:58:49PM +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
>> On 2024-07-22 11:40, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
>>> Hi Nilesh,
>>>
>>> I joined Astro team and took care of matplotlib rdeps there.
>>>
>>> I'm struggling with basemap... I don't understand how
>>> this multi-package with it's 3 setup.py works.
>>> It's the very last rdpeps that will block migration later on.
>>>
>>> I think it's the right time to upload to Unstable.
>>> ---
>>>
>>> matplotlib build is failing right now too.
>>> Salsa CI logs are truncated & useless.
>>>
>>>   dh_sphinxdoc -O--buildsystem=pybuild
>>> dh_sphinxdoc: error:
>>> debian/python-matplotlib-doc/usr/share/doc/python-matplotlib-doc/html/search.html
>>> does not load searchindex.js
>>> make: *** [debian/rules:26: binary] Error 25
>>> dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary subprocess
>>> returned exit status 2
>>> I: copying local configuration
>>> E: Failed autobuilding of package
>>>
>>> Greetings
>>
>>
>> Thanks Alexandre.  Certainly I'll be happy to have matplotlib 3.8 (if not
>> 3.9) in unstable, if we can live with kicking basemap out of testing.
>> scipy-docs will use matplotlib-docs.
>>
>> The new basemap has pushed setup.py down into one of the subdirs.  I've
>> haven't looked into it deeply, but I'm wondering if it might work just
>> setting appropriate PYBUILD_* variables in debian to point sourcedir at the
>> new subdir containing setup.py? i.e. activating pybuild's --dir option. Not
>> sure if that would mean a PYBUILD_DIR variable or something else. Depends on
>> whether we can ignore the other new subdirs. I haven't checked for
>> correspondence between the new and the old basemap source.
> Yes, new upstream release is different, I plan work on it after DebConf.
> But, do we need remove basemap from testing?

-- 
Sdrager,
Blair Noctis

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

(none) Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 11:50 +0200
  Re: Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> - 2024-07-22 13:00 +0200
    Re:  Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@debian.org> - 2024-07-22 15:10 +0200
      Re: Blair Noctis <n@sail.ng> - 2024-07-22 15:20 +0200
    Re: basemap Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-08-01 09:20 +0200
      Re: basemap Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@debian.org> - 2024-08-03 01:30 +0200
      Re: basemap Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2024-08-16 16:40 +0200
        Re: basemap Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com> - 2024-08-30 19:10 +0200
  Re: Matplotlib testing migration Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org> - 2024-07-22 15:40 +0200

csiph-web