Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #10358 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-03-13 10:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2018-03-13 20:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.java
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#870258: GCC 7 related library transitions Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2018-03-13 10:30 +0100
Bug#870258: GCC 7 related library transitions Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> - 2018-03-13 20:50 +0100
| From | Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-13 10:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#870258: GCC 7 related library transitions |
| Message-ID | <vsOpP-3Ur-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 13.03.2018 09:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 03/03/18 10:59, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> As you can see it's a bunch of packages building with gcc-6 & g++-6. They probably >> need new upstream versions that support GCC 7. The only exception is libpam-script >> build-depending on libgfortran3 for no apparent good reason. I filed #889876 for that. > > I filed bugs for these: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-gcc@lists.debian.org;tag=gcc-6-rm > >> As for the GCJ removal, I crafted this list of binary packages. This is running >> for sid, so it catches more stuff. > >> Some things here need to be updated to use openjdk or default-jdk, e.g. kamailio, pdftk, libidn... >> Other things likely need to be removed since GCJ is no more, e.g. ant-gcj, ecj-gcj... > > And for these: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-gcc@lists.debian.org;tag=gcj-rm Please could you extend the latter with bug reports where default-jdk/default-jre is going to away altogether because it's provided by gcj? Things like db5.3 come to my mind ... Matthias
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-13 20:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vsY5P-1WP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #10358 |
On 13/03/18 10:25, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 13.03.2018 09:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 03/03/18 10:59, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> As you can see it's a bunch of packages building with gcc-6 & g++-6. They probably
>>> need new upstream versions that support GCC 7. The only exception is libpam-script
>>> build-depending on libgfortran3 for no apparent good reason. I filed #889876 for that.
>>
>> I filed bugs for these:
>>
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-gcc@lists.debian.org;tag=gcc-6-rm
>>
>>> As for the GCJ removal, I crafted this list of binary packages. This is running
>>> for sid, so it catches more stuff.
>>
>>> Some things here need to be updated to use openjdk or default-jdk, e.g. kamailio, pdftk, libidn...
>>> Other things likely need to be removed since GCJ is no more, e.g. ant-gcj, ecj-gcj...
>>
>> And for these:
>>
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-gcc@lists.debian.org;tag=gcj-rm
>
> Please could you extend the latter with bug reports where
> default-jdk/default-jre is going to away altogether because it's provided by
> gcj? Things like db5.3 come to my mind ...
default-{jdk,jre} are provided by gcj on hurd and hppa. Worst case we'll have to
remove it and the rdeps on those architectures, but I'll open bugs against
openjdk-9 with a Cc for the porters in case they can take a look at it.
Emilio
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.java
csiph-web