Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #9889 > unrolled thread

byte-buddy

Started byFelix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net>
First post2017-08-13 19:50 +0200
Last post2017-08-25 14:40 +0200
Articles 5 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.java


Contents

  byte-buddy Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net> - 2017-08-13 19:50 +0200
    Re: byte-buddy tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2017-08-14 01:30 +0200
    Re: byte-buddy tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2017-08-14 02:50 +0200
      Re: byte-buddy Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net> - 2017-08-15 21:00 +0200
        Re: byte-buddy Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net> - 2017-08-25 14:40 +0200

#9889 — byte-buddy

FromFelix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net>
Date2017-08-13 19:50 +0200
Subjectbyte-buddy
Message-ID<ue5br-1FJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
hello Debian-java,

https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/libbyte-buddy-java.git
has been superseded by:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/byte-buddy.git

How can I remove the first one?
Just do a:
- cd /git/pkg-java
- mv libbyte-buddy-java.git /tmp
on git-debian.org?

Also, could we do a new upload of 1.7.1+dfsg1-1?

byte-buddy (1.7.1+dfsg1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium

  * fix watch file (releases instead of tags, dversionmangle)
  * remove precompiled content from orig-source

 -- Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net>  Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:03:14 +0200

Many Thanks and Best Regards,
-- 
Felix Natter

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#9890

Fromtony mancill <tmancill@debian.org>
Date2017-08-14 01:30 +0200
Message-ID<ueaut-515-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#9889

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi Felix,

On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 07:48:29PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> hello Debian-java,
> 
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/libbyte-buddy-java.git
> has been superseded by:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/byte-buddy.git

+1 for naming the repo to match the name of the source package.
 
> How can I remove the first one?
> Just do a:
> - cd /git/pkg-java
> - mv libbyte-buddy-java.git /tmp
> on git-debian.org?

Sure.  Or if we no longer need the contents, we can simply delete the
old repo.  Let me know if this is appropriate and I will take care of
it.

> Also, could we do a new upload of 1.7.1+dfsg1-1?
> 
> byte-buddy (1.7.1+dfsg1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
> 
>   * fix watch file (releases instead of tags, dversionmangle)
>   * remove precompiled content from orig-source
> 
>  -- Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net>  Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:03:14 +0200

Yes.  I will do this momentarily.

Cheers,
tony

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9891

Fromtony mancill <tmancill@debian.org>
Date2017-08-14 02:50 +0200
Message-ID<uebJT-5EW-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#9889

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 07:48:29PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> Also, could we do a new upload of 1.7.1+dfsg1-1?
> 
> byte-buddy (1.7.1+dfsg1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
> 
>   * fix watch file (releases instead of tags, dversionmangle)
>   * remove precompiled content from orig-source
> 
>  -- Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net>  Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:03:14 +0200

Hi Felix,

The packaging in the repo fails to build for me in a clean sid chroot:

> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.6.1:compile (default-compile) on project byte-buddy-dep: Compilation failure
> [ERROR] Bad service configuration file, or exception thrown while constructing Processor object: javax.annotation.processing.Processor: Provider lombok.launch.AnnotationProcessorHider$AnnotationProcessor could not be instantiated: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: lombok.core.AnnotationProcessor

This looks very similar to [0] and [1], although it's not clear to me
what is needed to resolve [0] and the work-around for [1] did not change
the situation - instead of a RuntimeException above, I get:

> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.6.1:compile (default-compile) on project byte-buddy-dep: Compilation failure
> [ERROR] Could not instantiate an instance of processor 'lombok.launch.AnnotationProcessorHider'

Which is essentially the same thing.  Is the package building for you in
a clean sid chroot?

Thank you,
tony

[0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814876
[1] https://github.com/rzwitserloot/lombok/issues/905

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9900

FromFelix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net>
Date2017-08-15 21:00 +0200
Message-ID<uePei-4Zy-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#9891
tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> writes:

hello Tony,

>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.6.1:compile (default-compile) on project byte-buddy-dep: Compilation failure
>> [ERROR] Could not instantiate an instance of processor 'lombok.launch.AnnotationProcessorHider'
>
> Which is essentially the same thing.  Is the package building for you in
> a clean sid chroot?

Sorry, I see this in a pbuilder chroot as well. I also tried the patch mentioned
in [1], and I got:

[ERROR] Could not instantiate an instance of processor
'lombok.launch.AnnotationProcessorHider$AnnotationProcessor'

This class is in the Debian lombok jar.

I also tried to change the scope of lombok from provided to compile.
I do not think it is related to the lombok version (1.16.16 vs 1.16.8).

Has anybody got an idea?

Thanks and Best Regards,
-- 
Felix Natter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9946

FromFelix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net>
Date2017-08-25 14:40 +0200
Message-ID<uim42-43d-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#9900
Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net> writes:

> tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> writes:
>
> hello Tony,

hello debian-java,

>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.6.1:compile (default-compile) on project byte-buddy-dep: Compilation failure
>>> [ERROR] Could not instantiate an instance of processor 'lombok.launch.AnnotationProcessorHider'
>>
>> Which is essentially the same thing.  Is the package building for you in
>> a clean sid chroot?
>
> Sorry, I see this in a pbuilder chroot as well. I also tried the patch mentioned
> in [1], and I got:
>
> [ERROR] Could not instantiate an instance of processor
> 'lombok.launch.AnnotationProcessorHider$AnnotationProcessor'
>
> This class is in the Debian lombok jar.
>
> I also tried to change the scope of lombok from provided to compile.
> I do not think it is related to the lombok version (1.16.16 vs 1.16.8).
>
> Has anybody got an idea?

As Tony is already the liblombok-java maintainer, shall I ask upstream?
Any other idea?

Thanks and Best Regards,
-- 
Felix Natter

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.java


csiph-web