Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #10088 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-10-14 11:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-10-17 15:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.java
CDBS regression affecting Java packages Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-14 11:30 +0200
Re: CDBS regression affecting Java packages Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2017-10-17 12:50 +0200
Re: CDBS regression affecting Java packages Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-17 14:00 +0200
Re: CDBS regression affecting Java packages Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-17 15:40 +0200
| From | Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-10-14 11:30 +0200 |
| Subject | CDBS regression affecting Java packages |
| Message-ID | <uAqVA-7ue-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi all, FYI many Java packages are currently failing to build due to a regression in CDBS 0.4.143 (#878510). The DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION variable now contains the Debian revision and the builds typically break during the install phase because the path of the jars to install becomes wrong. Emmanuel Bourg
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-10-17 12:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uBxBE-Z8-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #10088 |
On 14.10.2017 11:29, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi all, > > FYI many Java packages are currently failing to build due to a > regression in CDBS 0.4.143 (#878510). The DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION variable > now contains the Debian revision and the builds typically break during > the install phase because the path of the jars to install becomes wrong. I see that many packages are now converted to use plain debhelper. Should that be a soft release goal for all java packages? Matthias
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-10-17 14:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uByHn-1GV-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #10090 |
Le 17/10/2017 à 12:40, Matthias Klose a écrit : > I see that many packages are now converted to use plain debhelper. Should that > be a soft release goal for all java packages? Yes I think it's a good idea to standardize on a single system to simplify the maintenance (23% Java packages use CDBS, down from 40% last year and 64% two years ago). CDBS with Maven has an annoying bug that makes it run the tests twice, so the build is slower than DH. With debhelper I miss the DEB_MAVEN_* variables though, that was convenient to quickly tweak the build without overriding dh_auto_build, dh_auto_test and dh_auto_clean. Emmanuel Bourg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-10-17 15:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uBAga-2Pq-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #10090 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Am 17.10.2017 um 12:40 schrieb Matthias Klose: > On 14.10.2017 11:29, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> FYI many Java packages are currently failing to build due to a >> regression in CDBS 0.4.143 (#878510). The DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION variable >> now contains the Debian revision and the builds typically break during >> the install phase because the path of the jars to install becomes wrong. > > I see that many packages are now converted to use plain debhelper. Should that > be a soft release goal for all java packages? I believe that's more or less already the case but is nowhere documented. I always do it when I come across a CDBS package which needs a major update anyway. I also think that focusing on DH will make maintenance easier in the long-term for everyone involved. Markus
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.java
csiph-web