Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12433 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-09-19 17:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2022-09-24 23:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.java
wrong information in the manifest files of eclipse-platform-runtime Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2022-09-19 17:50 +0200
Re: wrong information in the manifest files of eclipse-platform-runtime Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-09-22 22:20 +0200
Re: wrong information in the manifest files of eclipse-platform-runtime Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2022-09-24 14:50 +0200
tomcat10 in debian experimental Alberto Senni <alberto.senni@gmail.com> - 2022-09-24 22:20 +0200
Re: tomcat10 in debian experimental Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2022-09-24 23:10 +0200
| From | Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-09-19 17:50 +0200 |
| Subject | wrong information in the manifest files of eclipse-platform-runtime |
| Message-ID | <F7rbX-8EDR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi All, While investigating #1010983, I noticed that the manifest files of eclipse-platform-runtime mentions that it needs javax.annotation version="1.3.5", but in Debian we have version 1.3 as supplied by libgeronimo-annotation-1.3-spec-java. Unless anyone has any objection I will like to do a team upload with the attached patch fixing the manifest files. Its only a change in the manifest file to add a range of 1.3 to 1.3.5 for javax.annotation and remove javax.annotation from "Require-Bundle". -- Regards Sudip
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-09-22 22:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: wrong information in the manifest files of eclipse-platform-runtime |
| Message-ID | <F8APT-9mUs-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #12433 |
Hi Sudip, Le 19/09/2022 à 17:47, Sudip Mukherjee a écrit : > While investigating #1010983, I noticed that the manifest files of > eclipse-platform-runtime mentions that it needs javax.annotation > version="1.3.5", but in Debian we have version 1.3 as supplied by > libgeronimo-annotation-1.3-spec-java. Is this causing an issue somewhere? > Unless anyone has any objection I will like to do a team upload with > the attached patch fixing the manifest files. Its only a change in the > manifest file to add a range of 1.3 to 1.3.5 for javax.annotation and > remove javax.annotation from "Require-Bundle". What about changing the version in libgeronimo-annotation-1.3-spec-java instead? The Eclipse source packages publish 120+ binary packages, if we start tweaking manually their OSGi metadata to fit what we have in Debian this will turn into a maintenance nightmare. Emmanuel Bourg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-09-24 14:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <F9cLv-9KdH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #12434 |
Hi Emmanuel, On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 9:07 PM Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Sudip, > > Le 19/09/2022 à 17:47, Sudip Mukherjee a écrit : > > > While investigating #1010983, I noticed that the manifest files of > > eclipse-platform-runtime mentions that it needs javax.annotation > > version="1.3.5", but in Debian we have version 1.3 as supplied by > > libgeronimo-annotation-1.3-spec-java. > > Is this causing an issue somewhere? Yes, eclipse-tracecompass is now completely unusable. https://bugs.debian.org/1010983 > > > > Unless anyone has any objection I will like to do a team upload with > > the attached patch fixing the manifest files. Its only a change in the > > manifest file to add a range of 1.3 to 1.3.5 for javax.annotation and > > remove javax.annotation from "Require-Bundle". > > What about changing the version in libgeronimo-annotation-1.3-spec-java > instead? The Eclipse source packages publish 120+ binary packages, if we > start tweaking manually their OSGi metadata to fit what we have in > Debian this will turn into a maintenance nightmare. Changing the manifest in libgeronimo-annotation-1.3-spec-java will be easier but then the manifest will be giving wrong version information. And, also its just not eclipse-platform-runtime vs. libgeronimo-annotation-1.3-spec-java. 1) equinox-p2 wants bounycastle 1.65.0 but we have v1.71. Bug report at [1]. 2) bouncycastle manifest files do not have any information about Bundle-Version, Bundle-Name, Export-Package. Bug report at [2]. [1]. https://bugs.debian.org/1020299 [2]. https://bugs.debian.org/1019488 -- Regards Sudip
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alberto Senni <alberto.senni@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-09-24 22:20 +0200 |
| Subject | tomcat10 in debian experimental |
| Message-ID | <F9jMZ-9P1z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #12435 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi to all when the tomcat 10 package will be available in debian stable Thanks Alberto Senni
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-09-24 23:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: tomcat10 in debian experimental |
| Message-ID | <F9kzn-9PwT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #12436 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi, Am Samstag, dem 24.09.2022 um 22:17 +0200 schrieb Alberto Senni: > Hi to all > > when the tomcat 10 package will be available in debian stable We intend to ship with Tomcat 10 in Debian 12 "Bookworm" but the next stable release is scheduled for 2023, so you have to be patient. Regards, Markus
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.java
csiph-web