Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #11245
| From | Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java, linux.debian.ports.sparc, linux.debian.ports.powerpc |
| Subject | Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW) |
| Date | 2019-05-27 23:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <y2v2y-1Zc-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <y26Qx-3Ni-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 26.05.19 21:13, Matthias Klose wrote: > The openjdk-8 packages which were unfortunately removed from unstable (although > the issue #915620 only asked for the removal of some binaries), are now again in > NEW, targeting unstable. One of the FTP assistants is objecting to the upload > to unstable, apparently because somebody (security team, Moritz?) asked to > restore these packages in experimental instead of unstable. Otoh, we still need > these packages in unstable to bootstrap kotlin (yes we can bootstrap in > experimental, but then it's not assured how to build kotlin for unstable with an > experimental build). > > I honestly don't understand why FTP master would have such an objection, so > please clarify what prohibits the acceptance to unstable with an RC issue to not > propagate these packages to testing. The packages are now accepted and the 8u212-b03 upstream version is now uploaded as well. The changes and buildinfo files didn't exist anymore for the powerpc, ppc64, sparc64 and x32 binaries, so if a porter wants to restore those, please rebuild them with manually installed openjdk-8 packages from snapshot.debian.org. Matthias
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW) Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2019-05-26 21:20 +0200
Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW) Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2019-05-26 23:50 +0200
Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW) Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2019-05-27 22:30 +0200
Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW) Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2019-05-27 23:10 +0200
Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW) Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2019-05-27 23:10 +0200
Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW) Saif Abdul Cassim <saif.15@cse.mrt.ac.lk> - 2019-05-28 11:50 +0200
Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW) John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2019-05-28 11:50 +0200
csiph-web