Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #11243

Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again

From Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again
Date 2019-05-27 19:20 +0200
Message-ID <y2rrY-88e-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <y2a7L-5If-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <y2a7L-5If-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <y2bnb-6E7-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <y2pzP-6XC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <y2rrY-88e-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 27.05.19 18:23, Gil Tene wrote:
>> Did you try to contact Debian folks to give them opportunity to fix those security concerns before going public with them? Or did they not react in time?
> 
> Multiple times over ~4.5 years, and through multiple channels. The
> “we don’t care”, “go away, vendor”, and “java and openjdk do versioning
> wrong” reactions are the most common. Many were less polite than that.
> The defensive tone of the email you see on this thread is about average.
> The denial and deflection attempts you see there are also common.

I can't follow that.  There is not a single bug report about that in the Debian
tracker.   Looking at the Debian Java mailing list, there is not a single
posting from your side.  And I can't remember that being discussed on the ML
either.  Also not on the distro-pkg-dev ML.  Same thing for the Ubuntu bug
tracker.  So which channels are you using?

> Some people just don’t want help, at least not from some. And that’s fine.

I raised questions about the versioning on the jdk ML's multiple times.  Most of
those were ignored, or saw the versioning as being correct.  I brought up the
configuration issues at this year OpenJDK committers workshop, but it was voted
down because other topics seemed more pressing to discuss.

Matthias

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com> - 2019-05-27 00:50 +0200
  Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again Gil Tene <gil@azul.com> - 2019-05-27 02:10 +0200
    Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stuefe@gmail.com> - 2019-05-27 17:20 +0200
      Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2019-05-27 17:40 +0200
      Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com> - 2019-05-27 19:20 +0200
  Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again Gil Tene <gil@azul.com> - 2019-05-27 03:30 +0200
    Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg@gmail.com> - 2019-05-27 12:20 +0200
      Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> - 2019-05-27 13:00 +0200
        Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg@gmail.com> - 2019-05-28 11:00 +0200
      Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg@gmail.com> - 2019-05-28 11:00 +0200
      Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again Gil Tene <gil@azul.com> - 2019-05-28 18:10 +0200
    Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg@gmail.com> - 2019-05-27 12:20 +0200
      OpenJDK upstream ↔ Debian packages mapping (was Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again) Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2019-05-27 18:30 +0200
        Re: OpenJDK upstream ↔ Debian packages mapping (was Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again) Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg@gmail.com> - 2019-05-28 12:00 +0200
    Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> - 2019-05-27 12:40 +0200
      Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again Gil Tene <gil@azul.com> - 2019-05-28 18:00 +0200

csiph-web