Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #9995

Re: libbatik-java: Changed artifacts?

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Christopher Hoskin <christopher.hoskin@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: libbatik-java: Changed artifacts?
Date Sun, 10 Sep 2017 09:10:01 +0200
Message-ID <uo4xr-gP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <unNwB-5vc-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <unOVI-6zR-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <unQNQ-7Xa-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <unS3f-fN-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <unSFY-IW-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <unSPE-Nx-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Sun Sep 10 07:03:50 2017
Old-Return-Path <christopher.hoskin@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.799 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+RzCMZuxTzBjkU2k6ZEHHnXZ5nFfgzeTE9dpy7r+Tqk=; b=Pio7iXsXee/Uj478msYsKGKx6ZBySt9z7iHlGhOigSlfrtAlaiWngtEej/fAtf1rbC TsQmgorEGvdp4BbyLvr87dg38ZVJrG+rUD9g0HE1oBHqhVFM/h9tESj0Hr94tCFMHBgJ 80QfjI14XtRDEpTr8jYlO+lPSEXGFM+X4aPhth8uQijGEIHhx0ZFRjlspvEqHEmX8p8n xGo3PVL2V4WeN7tqAeGq9AtX9tiAmC4DT39Kvsk9nBXtKi1ABibRKIH7AFMSLRI+jsCf WfPqBfQXjJ9MwfnHNf7e9DuO++97BKiNHfQSHyPuXSIQHqiQ9ZP013+O0foZkfgU2Ajn LeOw==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+RzCMZuxTzBjkU2k6ZEHHnXZ5nFfgzeTE9dpy7r+Tqk=; b=dmRMn6H9vajogf3abqCiWnFHfOh4xymyc77z8Uzlx0fSh2Dkj9OgDCERTVILAIqyZh g1Kyh2ypKJdfPsI1kIjriUw5MMlR/pGPdW2etkPDDzmZ/M8AuBzTvkHsJr7BFueF5hOD PukDif2PCLp9u/Ul5YgAZPZwH8zgTGkpYF7SA3t2lk1JByK3VjeEsKzR5jvFFU7GHmiN 5QGTnZzvdzgj++kPQTbRzsX1WFCF3ZEYdCV87o7uAgJPvaVzfHOOQKwzaoT7BF76D0Is DoEkSyRInyrIq1jh+eBTXxN78DalenI1/E7Azv8yldd3eYKR6uYZPisECzAA2UbWa77z R8tg==
X-Gm-Message-State AHPjjUglFbBxP5Og52N6nQr7gob9W5wEL97bRObcHOSOrrdfogtt5elx OUna4DBE4ORpdRij346pUzjVV37wKj3pErU=
X-Google-SMTP-Source AOwi7QAEbJfF7wxDwTTCp1q1QZRHTmxB/D0AzC7IwCUwaNeTgRY4vCuqtPdMVvunB3MxolNxHnld62EfTuTA3dtdgkA=
X-Received by 10.55.162.7 with SMTP id l7mr6765999qke.154.1505026990976; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 00:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailing-List <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20359
List-ID <debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAEjvcd8RQrgRemoZ0Kf8+kYTBR=ATrdsLv7UThfZUEG_1qx3qA@mail.gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 43
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc Debian Java <debian-java@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Sun, 10 Sep 2017 08:03:10 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <CAEjvcd8RQrgRemoZ0Kf8+kYTBR=ATrdsLv7UThfZUEG_1qx3qA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <878thoyqnz.fsf@bitburger.home.felix> <CAEjvcd83TA8_f_daa8gy4oWBH5VzFJCt2PMEh3F0Rm4_xeZf5Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAEjvcd-mVm-rFO9qsGGjzAgtaGH-p7jVdWQ_L8omSBSeigyseA@mail.gmail.com> <87fubvvkdm.fsf@bitburger.home.felix> <CAEjvcd_JuuHM3AoC0p6-ajHVsCf9iu7-Ye8yuDOUiT3m_DzFug@mail.gmail.com> <3cf85cf3-2667-12be-eaf6-cae7899927ad@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:9995

Show key headers only | View raw


Dear Markus,

Thanks - that's useful to know.

ratt -dry_run batik_1.9-1_source.changes 2> >(wc -l)
554

Hmm, this could take a while... I guess it must be looking for
recursive reverse build dependencies?

Christopher



On 9 September 2017 at 19:31, Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> wrote:
> Am 09.09.2017 um 20:22 schrieb Christopher Hoskin:
>>>
>>> One suggestion: If you update a library, it would be good to test
>>> whether any r-dep fails to build. There are not many for the case of
>>> batik.
>>>
>>
>> Is there an automated way to rebuild all of the reverse dependencies
>> of a package and see a summary of the outcome? libbatik-java has 25
>> immediate reverse dependencies which would take a while. It would be
>> good to leave it running in the background whilst I do something else.
>>
>> (Yes I could write a script, but as developers must be updating
>> libraries all the time, I suspect a well-polished one should already
>> exist.)
>>
>> Christopher
>
> There is for instance ratt [1] or debomatic [2].
>
> [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ratt
> [2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/debomatic
>
> We probably should collect all this information including your AWS
> mass-rebuild setup at wiki.debian.org. I'll give it a try soon.
>
> Markus
>

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

libbatik-java: Changed artifacts? Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net> - 2017-09-09 15:00 +0200
  Re: libbatik-java: Changed artifacts? Christopher Hoskin <mans0954@debian.org> - 2017-09-09 16:30 +0200
    Re: libbatik-java: Changed artifacts? Christopher Hoskin <mans0954@debian.org> - 2017-09-09 18:30 +0200
      Re: libbatik-java: Changed artifacts? Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net> - 2017-09-09 19:50 +0200
        Re: libbatik-java: Changed artifacts? Christopher Hoskin <mans0954@debian.org> - 2017-09-09 20:30 +0200
          Re: libbatik-java: Changed artifacts? Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-09-09 20:40 +0200
            Re: libbatik-java: Changed artifacts? Christopher Hoskin <christopher.hoskin@gmail.com> - 2017-09-10 09:10 +0200
              Re: libbatik-java: Changed artifacts? Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 20:30 +0200
          Re: libbatik-java: Changed artifacts? Eugene Zhukov <eugene@debian.org> - 2017-09-10 08:00 +0200

csiph-web