Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #9983

Re: Security issue in groovy<2.5.0

From Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: Security issue in groovy<2.5.0
Date 2017-09-07 05:00 +0200
Message-ID <umVcR-29h-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <uiNxf-4a9-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <ulhKy-45Y-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <ulSK6-1QU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <um5nX-16D-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <umL3P-49l-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:01 AM, 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan wrote:

> Changing the maintainer to Debian QA Group does not seem incorrect to me.

Unfortunately orphaning packages tends to attract deletionists, so you
have to be vigilant to ensure the package doesn't get removed from
Debian entirely. If no-one on the Java team cares about it, maybe just
removing it is fine though.

> However, I'm curious about the situation when someone wants to upload a simple change to an orphaned package. Do people refrain from it or they simply do a non-maintainer upload?

They do a QA upload:

https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu-qa-upload

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Security issue in groovy<2.5.0 Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net> - 2017-08-17 20:20 +0200
  Re: Security issue in groovy<2.5.0 Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net> - 2017-08-26 18:20 +0200
    Re: Security issue in groovy<2.5.0 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-08-26 18:50 +0200
      Re: Security issue in groovy<2.5.0 Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net> - 2017-08-26 20:00 +0200
        Re: Security issue in groovy<2.5.0 Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net> - 2017-08-26 20:40 +0200
          Re: Security issue in groovy<2.5.0 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2017-08-27 00:50 +0200
            Re: Security issue in groovy<2.5.0 Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net> - 2017-08-28 19:10 +0200
        Re: Security issue in groovy<2.5.0 Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net> - 2017-09-02 16:40 +0200
          Re: Security issue in groovy<2.5.0 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 08:10 +0200
            Re: Security issue in groovy<2.5.0 Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net> - 2017-09-04 21:40 +0200
              Re: Security issue in groovy<2.5.0 Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> - 2017-09-05 22:00 +0200
              Re: Security issue in groovy<2.5.0 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 18:10 +0200
                Re: Security issue in groovy<2.5.0 Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-09-07 05:00 +0200
  Re: Security issue in groovy<2.5.0 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-08-26 18:20 +0200
    Re: Security issue in groovy<2.5.0 Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net> - 2017-09-07 20:50 +0200
      Re: Security issue in groovy<2.5.0 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-09-07 21:10 +0200

csiph-web