Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #9903

Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Am 15.08.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Ghislain Vaillant:
[...]
> My understanding so far:
> 
> 1) DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nodoc: doc packages are built but left mostly empty
> 2) DEB_BUILD_PROFILES=nodoc: doc packages are not built at all
> 
>> This is a more general tool
>> chain issue for Java packages. At the moment I'm not sure how well it is
>> supported but it is certainly something we want to support.
> 
> I believe what I have done only answers 2), and I agree solving 1) is
> more of a toolchain issue. Same comment for nocheck support.
> 
> I am happy to take it out from both libimglib2-java and
> libparsington-java if it is an issue anyway. I find it convenient to use
> "nocheck nodoc" when I have got a number of builds of inter-dependent
> packages to run locally, but I could also live without.
> 
> Or perhaps I am completely wrong.

I never had to use build profiles because for me it was always something
related to bootstrapping Debian as a whole. This is actually the first
Java package I have seen where someone makes use of the build profile
syntax in debian/control.

I still believe what you want is support for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nodoc
similar to DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck. The nodoc option will be supported
by maven-debian-helper soon according to one of Emmanuel's last posts on
this list. I assume this will simply suppress the Javadoc step and you
will end up with an empty doc package which is basically the same as
having no documentation at all.

I don't mind uploading the package as is but wanted to point out that
build profiles is probably not what you really want.

Regards,

Markus

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 14:00 +0200
  Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2017-08-04 16:50 +0200
    Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 17:20 +0200
      Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2017-08-12 17:10 +0200
        Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 18:30 +0200
        Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-08-14 22:20 +0200
          Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 22:50 +0200
            Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-08-15 00:10 +0200
              Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 11:20 +0200
                Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-08-16 20:50 +0200
                Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 21:30 +0200
                Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-08-16 22:30 +0200
                Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-08-18 10:30 +0200
                Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-08-18 15:20 +0200

csiph-web