Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #10095

Re: scala-tools-sbinary_0.4.2+2.11.M5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Show all headers | View raw

Hi folks,

is there anything I can contribute?  It would be great if we could come
closer to the problem I was asking for in the beginning of the year[1]
to get sbt working.

Kind regards

       Andreas.

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2017/02/msg00239.html

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 10:42:53PM +0200, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Andreas Tille wrote:
> 
> > I was asking on IRC #debian-ftp how we can deal with the current
> > deadlock and lamby suggested to ping you again.  We are just waiting
> > for advise what to do next.  If re-uploading as it was is a sensible
> > thing to do please let us know.  If not, what exactly do you expect
> > us to do?
> 
> as long as all sources are available in the upload, I think the "buildable
> from source"-requirement can be loosened for bootstrapping the package.
> If I remember correctly, the missing sources and the incomplete
> debian/copyright have been the only reasons for the rejection (except
> somebody else objects now).
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:19:44AM +0200, Frederic Bonnard wrote:
> > > If binary jars for compilation are a problem, what should be done when
> > > for example you have a font file (with DFSG compatible license) that is
> > > used for generating image files at build time and those generated images
> > > will be included in the binary package. Should that source package be
> > > refused because the project didn't include the source of the font file
> > > (which can come from another project) ? (that could be a font file or
> > > any image without the source but with a DFSG license still)
> 
> Generally speaking, if you can not build each part of a binary package from
> source, this package can not be in main. Somehow you have to create that
> font file, afterwards you create the images and put them into the binary
> package. This doesn't sound much different from compiled sources!?
> 
>   Thorsten
> 
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: scala-tools-sbinary_0.4.2+2.11.M5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Frederic Bonnard <frediz@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-09-05 09:40 +0200
  Re: scala-tools-sbinary_0.4.2+2.11.M5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2017-10-04 21:30 +0200
    Re: scala-tools-sbinary_0.4.2+2.11.M5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Thorsten Alteholz <debian@alteholz.de> - 2017-10-04 22:50 +0200
      Re: scala-tools-sbinary_0.4.2+2.11.M5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2017-10-20 07:20 +0200
  Re: scala-tools-sbinary_0.4.2+2.11.M5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2017-11-15 17:00 +0100
    Re:  =?us-ascii?Q?scala-tools-sbinary=5F0=2E4=2E2+2=2E11=2EM5-1=5Famd?= =?us-ascii?Q?64=2Echanges?= REJECTED Frédéric Bonnard <frediz@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-11-17 12:20 +0100
      Re: =scala-tools-sbinary REJECTED Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2017-12-05 14:40 +0100

csiph-web