Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8958
| From | tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: Making OpenJDK 7 the default in Wheezy-LTS |
| Date | 2016-03-26 18:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rh02u-3Q2-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rgiNQ-7cM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hello Markus, On 03/24/2016 12:03 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi all, > > Wheezy-LTS is going to start next month and there is the intention to > switch the default-jre|jdk from OpenJDK 6 to OpenJDK 7 because the > latter can be supported until Wheezy reaches EOL in 2018-05-31. > > I've pushed a new branch wheezy-lts to java-common with the necessary > changes in debian/rules. > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/java-common.git/tree/debian/rules?h=wheezy-lts > > Can someone confirm that this is really sufficient to switch the default > to OpenJDK 7? > > Is there a way to change the preferred Java environment to OpenJDK 7 > with update-alternatives, assumed OpenJDK 6 was installed before? Is > this a good idea or should we just warn users about the fact that they > use an unsupported Java version on their system and recommend to do the > switch manually? Since things could potentially break, or the user might have already performed some custom configuration, I think warning the user via a new NEWS entry (see [1]) in java-common is appropriate. Then the user can take the necessary/desired action. > Otherwise I have identified four packages that strictly depend on > openjdk-6-jdk and fourteen packages that depend on openjdk-6-jre without > a good alternative. My intention is to switch the dependencies to > something like default-jre | java6-runtime or default-jdk | java6-sdk. > The change is trivial, I was just wondering why so many packages were in > this state back then. I recall there being some confusion (perhaps also perpetrated or propagated by me) as to the Right Way of specifying a java runtime dependency. We could (and probably should) add a lintian warning about such strict dependencies. > Any suggestions what should be avoided or done when switching the > default to OpenJDK 7 in Wheezy? I believe you are forging a new trail here. Thank you for investing in LTS support. Cheers, tony [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-news-debian
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Making OpenJDK 7 the default in Wheezy-LTS Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-03-24 20:10 +0100
Re: Making OpenJDK 7 the default in Wheezy-LTS tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2016-03-26 18:20 +0100
Re: Making OpenJDK 7 the default in Wheezy-LTS Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-03-28 18:10 +0200
Re: Making OpenJDK 7 the default in Wheezy-LTS Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-03-29 09:10 +0200
Re: Making OpenJDK 7 the default in Wheezy-LTS Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-03-29 21:00 +0200
Re: Making OpenJDK 7 the default in Wheezy-LTS Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> - 2016-03-29 13:00 +0200
Re: Making OpenJDK 7 the default in Wheezy-LTS Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-03-29 21:10 +0200
csiph-web