Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #9127

Re: New steganography application

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Am 22.05.2016 um 13:52 schrieb Tobias:
> Hi,
> 
> I still get the following lintian warnings:
> 
> W: stegosuite: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
> W: stegosuite: incompatible-java-bytecode-format Java8 version (Class format: 52)
> W: stegosuite: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/stegosuite
> 
> How to deal with them?
> It is a graphical application, so a man page wouldn't make much sense, I guess?

Hi,

> W: stegosuite: new-package-should-close-itp-bug

To avoid potential double work, it is encouraged to file a so called ITP
(intent to package) bug report.

https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/

After you have done that you can close the bug by adding (Closes:
#your_bug_number_here) to your debian/changelog.

> W: stegosuite: incompatible-java-bytecode-format Java8 version (Class format: 52)

You can either compile your application with a different class format
(e.g. Java 6 or Java 7) or ignore this warning because Java 8 is the
default Java implementation now. Of course it is preferable to support
older versions as well.

> W: stegosuite: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/stegosuite

Debian recommends to create man pages for applications even for
graphical ones. If stegosuite doesn't support any command line options,
you could still add a description and point to further documentation in
your man page. See the mediathekview package for example man pages.

Regards,

Markus

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

New steganography application Tobias <tobias@stegosuite.org> - 2016-04-03 00:50 +0200
  Re: New steganography application Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-04-03 21:10 +0200
    Re: New steganography application Tobias <tobias@stegosuite.org> - 2016-04-03 23:40 +0200
      Re: New steganography application Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-04-04 17:40 +0200
        Re: New steganography application Tobias <tobias@stegosuite.org> - 2016-04-05 23:10 +0200
          Re: New steganography application Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-04-05 23:30 +0200
            Re: New steganography application Tobias <tobias@stegosuite.org> - 2016-04-07 01:10 +0200
              Re: New steganography application Tobias <tobias@stegosuite.org> - 2016-05-14 12:50 +0200
                Re: New steganography application Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-05-16 12:20 +0200
                Re: New steganography application Tobias <tobias@stegosuite.org> - 2016-05-17 00:20 +0200
                Re: New steganography application Tobias <tobias@stegosuite.org> - 2016-05-22 14:00 +0200
                Re: New steganography application Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-05-23 11:40 +0200
                Re: New steganography application Tobias <tobias@stegosuite.org> - 2016-05-25 00:20 +0200

csiph-web