Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8917

Re: building android-studio

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: building android-studio
Date	Wed, 02 Mar 2016 13:40:02 +0100
Message-ID	<r8eem-7A8-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<r7WU9-4cC-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Wed Mar 2 12:37:43 2016
Old-Return-Path	<apo@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-12 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -5
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.6.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pRImU1lxVRIW0njUf9bTi0egkXvv42CNO"
X-Sa-Exim-Scanned	No (on richard.fcube.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19242
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/56D6DE85.7020203@debian.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	104
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:37:25 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<56D6DE85.7020203@debian.org>
X-Original-References	<56D5DA46.2020401@mailbox.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8917

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hello,

Am 01.03.2016 um 19:07 schrieb toogley:
> Hello.
> 
> 
> Context of my question:
> ======================
> 
> i want to package android studio. In the android studio package request
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747614 is intellij
> idea marked as blocking bug.
> I consider
> a) android-studio and intellij idea as quite independent, i.e. i think
> we don't need to package intellij idea first (but i'm at still unsure
> about it) and

Probably you don't have to package the whole IntelliJ IDE. Most recently
I have packaged intellij-annotations because I needed it as a
build-dependency for android-platform-tools-base. Especially for large
and complex projects like IntelliJ (last time I checked I noticed that
the source release bundles ~500 jars), it is often simpler to package
certain parts from maven central instead of trying to build everything.

> b) android-studio as more important, because for developing java are
> alternative IDE's available , but for developing android mostly none.
> But that's just an personal estimation.

Packaging android-studio for Debian would certainly be a nice addition.
Netbeans or an up-to-date Eclipse IDE should be able to accomplish most
of the tasks too as soon as all other Android components are packaged
for Debian though.


> actual question
> ===============
> 
> 1) removing teamcity build dependency
> 
> jetbrains is building their idea with teamcity, their commercial
> continuous integration service. Because the build script from
> android-studio hasn't changed, i guess they do the same. Although
> jetbrains is allowing open source projects to use teamcity freely, the
> license is still non-free - which makes it unsuitable for debian.
> Therefore i want to remove it, but I don't know how i can systematically
> remove it. I'm not sure if its the "best" way to just try to remove all
> teamscript related scripts/tests.

I suggest to refrain from packaging the complete IntelliJ IDE for now,
except you are really dedicated to this task and want to maintain this
package for the foreseeable future. I would go for packaging single
maven artifacts instead.

Regards,

Markus

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

building android-studio toogley <toogley@mailbox.org> - 2016-03-01 19:10 +0100
  Re: building android-studio 殷啟聰 <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 10:40 +0100
    Re: building android-studio toogley@mailbox.org - 2016-03-04 08:30 +0100
      Re: building android-studio toogley@mailbox.org - 2016-03-04 08:50 +0100
        Re: building android-studio Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2016-03-04 19:00 +0100
          Re: building android-studio toogley@mailbox.org - 2016-05-27 22:40 +0200
  Re: building android-studio Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-03-02 13:40 +0100
    Re: building android-studio toogley@mailbox.org - 2016-03-04 08:30 +0100
      Re: building android-studio Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-03-04 09:20 +0100

csiph-web