Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8526

Re: Packaging org.eclipse.jetty.alpn for Debian

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: Packaging org.eclipse.jetty.alpn for Debian
Date	Sat, 31 Oct 2015 17:40:02 +0100
Message-ID	<qpHma-57i-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qpnGO-1pv-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qpxmN-7pC-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Sat Oct 31 16:38:31 2015
Old-Return-Path	<apo@gambaru.de>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-12.58 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate:hard: -6.1
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cb3totUdbVv5rjwjsI7mgJkM8KvUNrUWg"
X-Sa-Exim-Scanned	No (on richard.fcube.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18845
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/5634EE74.8050507@gambaru.de
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	67
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Sat, 31 Oct 2015 17:38:12 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<5634EE74.8050507@gambaru.de>
X-Original-References	<5633C695.3050701@gambaru.de> <56345891.8040805@apache.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8526

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Am 31.10.2015 um 06:58 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Le 30/10/2015 20:35, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> 
>> What do you think?
> 
> I don't mind having a single class package, it's fairly exceptional. An
> alternative would be to ignore jetty-alpn and the related code (the
> netty package does that already). ALPN will be integrated to Java 9 [1],
> so this API is likely to become obsolete in the near future.
> 
> Emmanuel Bourg
> 
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051498

Ok, if ALPN will be integrated into Java 9 I think it's not worth the
effort to package a single class.

What do you think about this patch?

https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/undertow.git/tree/debian/patches/alpn-not-supported.patch

It works but I would like to hear some opinions about the

undertow/client/http2/Http2ClientProvider.java

part and if it makes sense.

Cheers,

Markus

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Packaging org.eclipse.jetty.alpn for Debian Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-10-30 20:40 +0100
  Re: Packaging org.eclipse.jetty.alpn for Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-10-31 07:00 +0100
    Re: Packaging org.eclipse.jetty.alpn for Debian Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-10-31 17:40 +0100
      Re: Packaging org.eclipse.jetty.alpn for Debian Jonathan Yu <jawnsy@cpan.org> - 2015-10-31 19:50 +0100
        Re: Packaging org.eclipse.jetty.alpn for Debian Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-11-01 18:50 +0100

csiph-web