Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8366

Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common

Path	csiph.com!au2pb.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.spin.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common
Date	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 18:00:04 +0200
Message-ID	<qby96-1o7-81@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qbtCp-3y2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qbx3j-8hS-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qbxd0-8t1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qbxwm-DB-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <qbxPJ-10s-75@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Tue Sep 22 15:55:17 2015
Old-Return-Path	<emmanuel.bourg@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.5 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.198, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate:hard: -7
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7xrTwwASD0JGz4nerMGnKC5SlBCC40/6caxKGX6zIIk=; b=Yq1crUL2iR7X50ZFSXGg2/nNNZouURUgWiuXs3uwdTEKw7ylSaFzJWqgjXHyuQ+ZG2 UyooTsCtDhCBUZQXs4RENLDISd6gxgZIVh+w1yga9RD8YTCJSo7Oy6fgJwTHS2Ojou1Y 6GLtEauFUwVYf1p8yenr+4Z6frtmoPbUqQLC+jByaxgssjZwx1COwgyuwPzBI70TKGYD jVaDgDw3NmPGrYCh0zvwuijRbh0C5z3y3d28Hfcfld0ZcYG2cPsLvyot6e+X6Y0w/qD0 cxNAGfpIfvmOL5ZZoJNY/JWy4npgri10tDQRqjeJJ905rSUQPXCAHrI/igNNxsfkti0B gBfQ==
X-Received	by 10.194.60.115 with SMTP id g19mr29094314wjr.29.1442937301921; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status	N1110
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18680
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/560179D4.90509@apache.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	18
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Date	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:55:00 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<560179D4.90509@apache.org>
X-Original-References	<56013554.6020608@apache.org> <5601694C.3010709@gambaru.de> <56016CCB.8090108@apache.org> <20150922151358.GA29631@dorf.mancill.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1509221732170.14541@tglase.lan.tarent.de>
X-Original-Sender	Emmanuel Bourg <emmanuel.bourg@gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8366

Show key headers only | View raw

Le 22/09/2015 17:32, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :

> Hmm. But in that case you also must split the source package.
> Just saying.

Yes, that's indeed my intent.


> Can’t you get it merged into the normal debian-policy package?

Good question, and that would probably close #395374, but I'm unsure
about the implications of such a move. Will the Java Team be able to
easily amend the Java policy if it's tied to the general debian-policy?
Can we still publish updates of the Java policy independently of the
debian-policy? Will we have to debate about changes on the debian-policy
list?

Emmanuel

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-22 13:10 +0200
  Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Jan Henke <Jan.Henke@taujhe.de> - 2015-09-22 14:00 +0200
  Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2015-09-22 14:00 +0200
    Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-22 19:50 +0200
  Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-22 16:50 +0200
    Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-22 17:00 +0200
      Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common tony <tmancill@debian.org> - 2015-09-22 17:20 +0200
        Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-22 17:40 +0200
        Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2015-09-22 17:40 +0200
          Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-22 18:00 +0200
            Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2015-09-22 18:10 +0200
            Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-23 00:00 +0200
  Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-23 10:00 +0200
    Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-23 11:20 +0200
      Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> - 2015-09-23 15:40 +0200

csiph-web