Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8695

Packaging sbt

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Frederic Bonnard <frediz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java, linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject	Packaging sbt
Date	Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:20:02 +0100
Message-ID	<qNBpg-4ua-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jan 5 15:18:09 2016
Old-Return-Path	<frederic@fr.ibm.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-9.33 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_FROM_MX=-3.1; rate: -6.1
X-Ibm-Helo	d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com
X-Ibm-Mailfrom	frederic@fr.ibm.com
X-Ibm-Rcptto	debian-java@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition	inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Tm-As-Mml	disable
X-Content-Scanned	Fidelis XPS MAILER
X-Cbid	16010514-0013-0000-0000-0000082F214F
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19014
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20160105155845.GC29723@kin.test.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	38
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:58:45 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<20160105155845.GC29723@kin.test.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8695 linux.debian.bugs.dist:706410

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Hi,
as Medhi suggested to me, I'm forwarding my questions here to debian Java
packaging team.
(Medhi answered in the bug : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639910#89 )
Any tip will be appreciated.
Thanks,

F.

> Hi,
> I'd be interested in packaging sbt in debian, and I saw the debian bug #639910 [1]
> and this simple-build-tool@googlegroups.com thread [2] .
> I guess there's not much progress, but I'm asking in case someone is active on
> that.
> Here is a summary of what I understood so far :
> a) to build sbt, you need sbt
> b) sbt [may] downloads components online when being used
> c) sbt upstream does not provide nor will support alternate build process (make,
>   ant, whatever)
> d) it seems difficult to provide a standalone tarball of a given version of sbt
>   (David M. Lee)
> Is each point [still] correct ?
> 
> I saw the proposition of Mehdi to ask the sbt upstream to propose a source
> tarball of sbt and include a standalone version of sbt, but I didn't see any
> answer (except if d) was one)
> Also I wanted to ask Mehdi, if there wasn't another way by putting sbt in
> nonfree. Or maybe have a sbt-bootstrap in nonfree, and a sbt in main that would
> be built from nonfree. Though, for sbt-bootstrap, we would need a self contained
> sbt (no internet download), right ?
> Any help will be welcome,
> Thanks and sorry for unburying such a hateful topic :)
> 
> F.
> 
> 
> 1: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639910
> 2: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/simple-build-tool/bFaUvjn_j60

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Packaging sbt Frederic Bonnard <frediz@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-05 16:20 +0100
  Re: Packaging sbt Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-05 16:40 +0100
    Re: Packaging sbt Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org> - 2016-01-06 02:00 +0100

csiph-web