Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8653

Re: Backport of figtree failed - but why

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: Backport of figtree failed - but why
Date	Mon, 07 Dec 2015 21:30:01 +0100
Message-ID	<qDaA1-T7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qDaqm-PS-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>, debian-java@lists.debian.org, Debian Med Packaging Team <debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Mon Dec 7 20:26:38 2015
Old-Return-Path	<emmanuel.bourg@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.697 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rabMhluIr6k+FEm4kyRfJ15jJFeW7KDdjrDlO20BTjU=; b=okoRnfWWvY9uig9sVk0rhi6D9DNGLHcbo0tmk1QvFQCK3eYunQsmNnugkOXnIVESP+ YCcixrYijwCyqaLGKHIpr4myimhEWrpTLaEPvqrvzq/gKP+9pzgNxQuAhflaIn26+iKx 5u43cIzvmIIFwMzX/U7LFDNxs4htEEu0mfEsHzWAPXosrQiCMASqho/IuzZIc1LQIQrd 4O/do3DUJwZhEOf5saVDF6N5lq2qc4XUUXsk9LL2e3hn/RrQ2xQ070hnrkOAofIcmv0T VP2qQ6xL3Ppfq+BJdHmhFP21K/uNrYkXGHUa14D9DpW4GGDRGi01GCY42PSmKVbbJ1SA Gk8A==
X-Received	by 10.28.18.9 with SMTP id 9mr22318085wms.96.1449519982765; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 12:26:22 -0800 (PST)
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18972
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/5665EB6C.8030804@apache.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	14
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Date	Mon, 7 Dec 2015 21:26:20 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<5665EB6C.8030804@apache.org>
X-Original-References	<20151207201432.GB24026@an3as.eu>
X-Original-Sender	Emmanuel Bourg <emmanuel.bourg@gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8653

Show key headers only | View raw

Hi Andreas,

Le 7/12/2015 21:14, Andreas Tille a écrit :

> I wonder what the difference between testing and Jessie might
> be that prevents the compilation.

"no suitable constructor found for MultiDocApplication" means you are
not using the right version of the package containing the
MultiDocApplication class. This class comes from libjam-java, and
figtree requires only the version 0.0.r304 but it should require >=
0.1.20140824-1~

Emmanuel Bourg

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Backport of figtree failed - but why Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2015-12-07 21:20 +0100
  Re: Backport of figtree failed - but why Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-12-07 21:30 +0100

csiph-web