Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8295
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Chris West <solo-debian-java@goeswhere.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: OpenJDK 8 transition |
| Date | Tue, 01 Sep 2015 22:20:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q40ca-7Z-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pR7O9-2HP-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-java@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Tue Sep 1 20:18:20 2015 |
| Old-Return-Path | <solo-debian-java@goeswhere.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-4.721 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FAKE_REPLY_C=1.486, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -6.1 |
| X-Greylist | delayed 424 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at bendel; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 20:18:06 UTC |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| User-Agent | Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18607 |
| List-ID | <debian-java.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20150901201037.GA18218@blind.goeswhere.com |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 56 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Tue, 1 Sep 2015 21:10:37 +0100 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <20150901201037.GA18218@blind.goeswhere.com> |
| X-Original-References | <55B73413.4090100@apache.org> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8295 |
Show key headers only | View raw
I did a practice partial archive rebuild with ebourg's 1.8 default-jdk,
to see what kind of problems might be left. 1144 packages[1] that
dose-debuildcheck thinks depend on default-jdk, around ten
unexpected/new failures.
My full notes are on whiteboard[2], with a backup at time of sending[3].
Final build logs; anything marked as "failure" here failed multiple times:
https://rbuild.fau.xxx/2015-08-31/
Probably broken by jdk8:
------------------------
default-jdk doesn't have /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/lib/tools.jar:
* biojava3-live
* biojava4-live
Refuses to run under jdk8:
* netbeans
fatal error: jni_md.h: No such file or directory
* libnb-platform18-java
"cannot access" errors are, I think, from -source 1.5:
* xmlbeans error: cannot access TypeStoreUser
* lucene4.10 error: cannot access SelfDescribing
* lucene4 error: cannot access SelfDescribing
* sweethome3d-furniture-editor error: cannot access Localizable
* freemind error: cannot access Opcodes
* gnome-split @Override
And, not so sure about these:
* jaxb <anonymous com.sun.tools.jxc.model.nav.ApNavigator$1> is not abstract and does not override abstract method <A>getAnnotationsByType(Class<A>) in AnnotatedConstruct
* jing-trang Annotations cannot be converted to AnnotationsImpl
* maven-stapler-plugin javadoc: error - option -locale must be first on the command line.
On top of these, there's:
* Eclipse things (which we know is being worked on)
* 15 packages which are probably broken due to incompatability with the
builder, or flaky test sets, which should probably be re-tested.
* 15 packages which need more time or memory or.. than the builder was
willing to give them, and should probably be tested.
* ~17 packages with RC bugs already
* ~15 packages with other build problems
Some of these may have already been fixed; been doing this for a few
days, on and off.
Chris.
(I'm on-list but much prefer IRC; #debian-java @ oftc.)
1: https://paste.debian.net/310020/
2: http://whiteboard.debian.net/a69515.txt
3: https://paste.debian.net/310023/
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-07-28 09:50 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2015-07-29 06:30 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition tmancill@debian.org - 2015-07-29 16:40 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-07-29 16:50 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-01 23:30 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2015-09-03 00:50 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-03 09:00 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2015-09-03 14:00 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2015-09-03 16:20 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2015-09-03 16:50 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2015-09-03 17:00 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-09-03 17:10 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> - 2015-07-29 16:40 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Chris West <solo-debian-java@goeswhere.com> - 2015-09-01 22:20 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-01 23:30 +0200
csiph-web