Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8219

Re: OpenJDK 8 transition

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From tmancill@debian.org
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: OpenJDK 8 transition
Date Wed, 29 Jul 2015 16:40:01 +0200
Message-ID <pRAGt-2rb-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pR7O9-2HP-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <pRra9-5K8-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-java@lists.debian.org
Old-Return-Path <tmancill@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-11.98 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP"
Content-Disposition inline
User-Agent Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Mailing-List <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18528
List-ID <debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 54
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:36:40 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID <20150729143640.GA13654@dorf.mancill.com>
X-Original-References <55B73413.4090100@apache.org> <55B8553A.8080204@debian.org>
Xref aioe.org linux.debian.maint.java:8219

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 09:23:22PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On 07/28/2015 12:49 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > We are reaching the end of the OpenJDK 8 transition, we are down to one
> > package failing to build with the new version, and not the least since
> > it's Eclipse. There is also a handful of patches available for other
> > packages waiting for their maintainers or a NMU [1].
> > 
> > I think we should now consider switching the default JDK. There is still
> > some time to migrate Eclipse before the next release.
> > 
> > I suggest that we do the switch the first week of September. OpenJDK 7
> > will remain available, but ultimately we aim for its removal in Stretch
> > to lower the maintenance burden.

Any concerns with an upload of java-commons to experimental sooner than
September?

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-07-28 09:50 +0200
  Re: OpenJDK 8 transition tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2015-07-29 06:30 +0200
    Re: OpenJDK 8 transition tmancill@debian.org - 2015-07-29 16:40 +0200
      Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-07-29 16:50 +0200
      Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-01 23:30 +0200
        Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2015-09-03 00:50 +0200
          Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-03 09:00 +0200
            Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2015-09-03 14:00 +0200
              Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2015-09-03 16:20 +0200
                Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2015-09-03 16:50 +0200
                Re: OpenJDK 8 transition John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2015-09-03 17:00 +0200
                Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-09-03 17:10 +0200
  Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> - 2015-07-29 16:40 +0200
  Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Chris West <solo-debian-java@goeswhere.com> - 2015-09-01 22:20 +0200
    Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-01 23:30 +0200

csiph-web