Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8219
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | tmancill@debian.org |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: OpenJDK 8 transition |
| Date | Wed, 29 Jul 2015 16:40:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pRAGt-2rb-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pR7O9-2HP-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <pRra9-5K8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-java@lists.debian.org |
| Old-Return-Path | <tmancill@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-11.98 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -5 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP" |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| User-Agent | Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18528 |
| List-ID | <debian-java.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/> |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 54 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:36:40 -0700 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <20150729143640.GA13654@dorf.mancill.com> |
| X-Original-References | <55B73413.4090100@apache.org> <55B8553A.8080204@debian.org> |
| Xref | aioe.org linux.debian.maint.java:8219 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 09:23:22PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > On 07/28/2015 12:49 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We are reaching the end of the OpenJDK 8 transition, we are down to one > > package failing to build with the new version, and not the least since > > it's Eclipse. There is also a handful of patches available for other > > packages waiting for their maintainers or a NMU [1]. > > > > I think we should now consider switching the default JDK. There is still > > some time to migrate Eclipse before the next release. > > > > I suggest that we do the switch the first week of September. OpenJDK 7 > > will remain available, but ultimately we aim for its removal in Stretch > > to lower the maintenance burden. Any concerns with an upload of java-commons to experimental sooner than September?
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-07-28 09:50 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2015-07-29 06:30 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition tmancill@debian.org - 2015-07-29 16:40 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-07-29 16:50 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-01 23:30 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2015-09-03 00:50 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-03 09:00 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2015-09-03 14:00 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2015-09-03 16:20 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2015-09-03 16:50 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2015-09-03 17:00 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-09-03 17:10 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> - 2015-07-29 16:40 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Chris West <solo-debian-java@goeswhere.com> - 2015-09-01 22:20 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-01 23:30 +0200
csiph-web