Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12770

Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf

From Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@reproducible-builds.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java, linux.debian.ports.arm
Subject Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf
Date 2024-05-21 19:40 +0200
Message-ID <IGBCV-eTt4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <IG6pr-eAHn-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 2024-05-20, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
> I want to clean up my Java packages.
>
> There are several with FTBR. I found that the day of the *.poms s a date 
> from 1970.
>
> for example they are the packages
>
> vinnie

Looking at the history for vinnie:

  https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/armhf/vinnie.html

It is only very recently that this started happening (2024-05-04)
without source changes in vinnie itself, so I would suspect some change
in the toolchain used to produce the .pom files?

commons-email is similar, although starting 2024-04-04:

  https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/armhf/commons-email.html

ez-vcard is similar too, starting 2024-04-20:

  https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/trixie/armhf/diffoscope-results/ez-vcard.html

Although some of those builds also have differences in some xz
contents... might just be related to the timestamp differences.


Wild hunch is one build is run on a 64-bit kernel (without a linux32
personality) and one build on a 32-bit kernel... that is one of the main
differences between these armhf test builds and builds on other
architectures, where this does not seem to happen...


live well,
  vagrant

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Builds not reproducible on armhf Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2024-05-20 10:20 +0200
  Re: Builds not reproducible on armhf Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@qvest-digital.com> - 2024-05-20 18:20 +0200
  Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@reproducible-builds.org> - 2024-05-21 19:40 +0200
    Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2024-08-24 21:00 +0200
      Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf Mechtilde <ooo@mechtilde.de> - 2024-08-24 21:40 +0200

csiph-web