Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12692

Re: [RFC] Removing support for GCJ and GCJFLAGS from dpkg?

Path	csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.dpkg, linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: [RFC] Removing support for GCJ and GCJFLAGS from dpkg?
Date	Thu, 31 Aug 2023 19:30:01 +0200
Message-ID	<H8TEt-5KHN-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<H8DJo-5ArQ-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-dpkg-request@lists.debian.org Thu Aug 31 17:28:05 2023
Old-Return-Path	<ebourg@apache.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-11.467 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.169, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -5.5
X-Greylist	delayed 470 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 17:27:45 UTC
Authentication-Results	apache.org; auth=none
MIME-Version	1.0
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Content-Language	en-US
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/21075
List-ID	<debian-dpkg.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/c4853e00-b73d-83c9-a1ef-e7aac700d093@apache.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	10
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Thu, 31 Aug 2023 19:19:50 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<c4853e00-b73d-83c9-a1ef-e7aac700d093@apache.org>
X-Original-References	<ZO/dZBOpg07i8sy3@thunder.hadrons.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.dpkg:12251 linux.debian.maint.java:12692

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Hi Guillem,

On 31/08/2023 02:23, Guillem Jover wrote:

> So I guess it should be fine to rip that off?

Yes go ahead, GCJ is long dead and gone, you can remove the remaining 
references safely.

Emmanuel Bourg

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

[RFC] Removing support for GCJ and GCJFLAGS from dpkg? Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2023-08-31 02:30 +0200
  Re: [RFC] Removing support for GCJ and GCJFLAGS from dpkg? tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2023-08-31 05:40 +0200
  Re: [RFC] Removing support for GCJ and GCJFLAGS from dpkg? Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-08-31 19:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC] Removing support for GCJ and GCJFLAGS from dpkg? Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2023-09-01 12:00 +0200

csiph-web