Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12690

[RFC] Removing support for GCJ and GCJFLAGS from dpkg?

Path csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.dpkg, linux.debian.maint.java
Subject [RFC] Removing support for GCJ and GCJFLAGS from dpkg?
Date Thu, 31 Aug 2023 02:30:02 +0200
Message-ID <H8DJo-5ArQ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
X-Original-To debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-dpkg-request@lists.debian.org Thu Aug 31 00:23:25 2023
Old-Return-Path <guillem@master.debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-112.211 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Mail-Followup-To debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition inline
X-Mailing-List <debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/21073
List-ID <debian-dpkg.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ZO/dZBOpg07i8sy3@thunder.hadrons.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 15
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Thu, 31 Aug 2023 02:23:00 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <ZO/dZBOpg07i8sy3@thunder.hadrons.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.dpkg:12248 linux.debian.maint.java:12690

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


Hi!

While going through the supported compilers and build flags recently,
I noticed that dpkg-buildflags and the various dpkg Makefile fragment
files still have support for gcj, but that compiler seems to have
stopped being maintained some time ago. According to Wikipedia
(<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Compiler_for_Java>) the final
release was in 2018, and we do not even have it in Debian anymore.

So I guess it should be fine to rip that off? A quick codesearch.d.n
didn't reveal much of a usage. But I'd like to hear whether this would
break or disrupt things, before I consider removing these.

Thanks,
Guillem

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

[RFC] Removing support for GCJ and GCJFLAGS from dpkg? Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2023-08-31 02:30 +0200
  Re: [RFC] Removing support for GCJ and GCJFLAGS from dpkg? tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2023-08-31 05:40 +0200
  Re: [RFC] Removing support for GCJ and GCJFLAGS from dpkg? Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-08-31 19:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC] Removing support for GCJ and GCJFLAGS from dpkg? Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2023-09-01 12:00 +0200

csiph-web