Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12682

Re: Can someone tell me if this bug is in the proper state?

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!news.servidellagleba.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: Can someone tell me if this bug is in the proper state?
Date Fri, 11 Aug 2023 06:00:01 +0200
Message-ID <H1rtD-XD2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <H1rah-Xw8-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Dan Mick <dmick@redhat.com>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Fri Aug 11 03:56:12 2023
Old-Return-Path <vladimir.petko@canonical.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-8.501 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[ATTENDEES_DBSPAM_BODY6=1, BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .canonical. - helo: .smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical. - helo-domain: .canonical.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5
X-Gm-Message-State AOJu0YzamG3kO0xICSKNZwdpbAXS6dCV0bRbAaAiU+mz+RuWJHHhqUVX CzMxCsIAOo7ye23RklKf1Oh5RGigY8OBqVCYwmcp99w/UaQpujssI+bedgHCSNtX+e5AuAOPJza GhPDpxTa549goPSdQomH4YZPldBA5RSceI8NTeBuKL0t8bAhSnRsrcOEYuQ==
X-Received by 2002:a0d:cb81:0:b0:573:2346:ea55 with SMTP id n123-20020a0dcb81000000b005732346ea55mr330815ywd.2.1691726145818; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-SMTP-Source AGHT+IEWV4dTyG5/NmnPYEWkSEtnM55VfJ1LuAKanywx30pnlf7IGEt1KkGzlkyAmhY/03Vokrx6lEtt/JQilKt+50U=
X-Received by 2002:a0d:cb81:0:b0:573:2346:ea55 with SMTP id n123-20020a0dcb81000000b005732346ea55mr330803ywd.2.1691726145329; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Mailing-List <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23364
List-ID <debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CALFf3kcZhMcYoV8LU=5JU1hm7i8dC5uJ+QhHRstPVPia1SJdjQ@mail.gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 26
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Fri, 11 Aug 2023 15:55:34 +1200
X-Original-Message-ID <CALFf3kcZhMcYoV8LU=5JU1hm7i8dC5uJ+QhHRstPVPia1SJdjQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <b6b2a979-6260-51e8-bb65-49255a31e733@redhat.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12682

Show key headers only | View raw


Hi,

As far as I know, the bug was fixed in [1] which is safe to update to.
Updating to 20230710 is also safe as the July security release version
contains ca-certificates-java trigger in the postinstall script.

Best Regards,
 Vladimir.

[1] https://tracker.debian.org/news/1436785/accepted-ca-certificates-java-20230620-source-into-unstable/


On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 3:30 PM Dan Mick <dmick@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi guys; sorry for the out-of-band email.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030129
>
> is affecting a number of projects on bookworm, ceph among them; I see
> that it's been tagged 'bookworm-ignore' and I worry that maybe that
> means no one is considering a backport to bookworm, but I think it
> warrants a backport.
>
> Can you advise?
>

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Can someone tell me if this bug is in the proper state? Dan Mick <dmick@redhat.com> - 2023-08-11 05:40 +0200
  Re: Can someone tell me if this bug is in the proper state? Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-08-11 06:00 +0200
    Re: Can someone tell me if this bug is in the proper state? Dan Mick <dmick@redhat.com> - 2023-08-11 06:50 +0200
    Re: Can someone tell me if this bug is in the proper state? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-08-11 06:50 +0200

csiph-web