Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12370

Re: libspring-java support

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: libspring-java support
Date Fri, 01 Apr 2022 12:10:01 +0200
Message-ID <E7mo9-5EMD-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <DqpH4-1cX-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <DqpH3-1cX-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org>, Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net>, Debian LTS <debian-lts@lists.debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Fri Apr 1 10:06:15 2022
Old-Return-Path <pochu27@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-6.262 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5.5
X-Gm-Message-State AOAM532QAu7DgJDz840/7/PlEgq20fy8npZYHzF8Kj0+ybA7TGwbNrac 3UzJOGKsbUTBBXkdVbNOtt0=
X-Google-SMTP-Source ABdhPJwLJd5WKwtbvBl29PSyI/936LdRUyAfOPVPR/eTVflF7u32VUZIzzZ/OMNQ4gdZmaiw+2Xhhg==
X-Received by 2002:a05:6000:1047:b0:204:101:7c79 with SMTP id c7-20020a056000104700b0020401017c79mr7221647wrx.277.1648806625928; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 02:50:25 -0700 (PDT)
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
MIME-Version 1.0
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Content-Language en-US
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Mailing-List <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23007
List-ID <debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1d23c657-bf6d-ae8c-9f21-c0cd9343d52e@debian.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 61
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc debian-java <debian-java@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Fri, 1 Apr 2022 11:50:23 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <1d23c657-bf6d-ae8c-9f21-c0cd9343d52e@debian.org>
X-Original-References <e00e8e48-b76e-4982-897e-a4a317974b82@beuc.net> <f588e081494c592ece8912dc5e62420fe5d9f941.camel@debian.org>
X-Original-Sender Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu27@gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12370

Show key headers only | View raw


Hi,

On 03/12/2021 23:50, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi Sylvain,
> 
> Am Freitag, dem 03.12.2021 um 14:28 +0100 schrieb Sylvain Beucler:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This year I worked on libspring-java twice for LTS&ELTS. In both case
>> upstream provided limited information for the CVEs, and for 5 of them
>> we're unable to determine the fixes.
>> https://deb.freexian.com/extended-lts/tracker/source-package/libspring-java
>>
>> Upstream declined to provide information to identify the fixes (which in
>> turn would allow us to determine whether stretch and jessie are
>> affected, and backport the fixes if needed).
>> https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/26821
>> https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/27647
>>
>> They made clear that they wouldn't provide this information even if
>> paid, confirming they apply a security-by-obscurity strategy similar to
>> Oracle's.
>>
>> I exchanged with the Debian security team after they witnessed the last
>> exchanges above, and 2 weeks ago they concluded the latest CVE was minor
>> and no action was needed right now. I insisted about the other, prior
>> unfixable CVEs (1/4 impacting buster) but they haven't answered yet.
>>
>> I think we're not in capacity to offer further security support for
>> libspring-java for LTS and ELTS, but I'd like to hear from other team
>> members, especially if they work in the Java team (Markus?) - what do
>> you think?
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Sylvain Beucler
>> Debian LTS Team
>>
> 
> I have made similar experiences like you when I contacted upstream and asked
> for more information about previous CVE. I agree with you that their policy
> makes future security support for us nearly impossible. Currently the main
> purpose of libspring-java is to build other software from source. We don't ship
> any application or web project that depends on Spring and exposes users to the
> currently unfixed CVE which means the current status of all CVE in
> Stretch/Buster/Bullseye (no-dsa/minor) is correct. It is also very unlikely
> that Java developers who use Spring/Spring Boot for their web applications
> depend on one of our Debian packages.
> 
> In my opinion it is OK to ignore the currently known CVE. I would support
> adding libspring-java to the list of unsupported packages because of the lack
> of upstream support. We, as the Java team, should make this clear by mentioning
> libspring-java in the next release notes for Debian 12.

Looks like Spring was marked as EOL in the security-tracker and 
debian-security-support git, but never uploaded to stretch or announced on 
debian-lts-announce (unless I missed it). I think this (as well as other 
packages recently EOL'ed) should be announced there, so users are aware. Should 
we add this to dla-needed so that someone can take care of it?

Cheers,
Emilio

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: libspring-java support Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2021-12-04 00:00 +0100
  Re: libspring-java support Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net> - 2022-04-01 12:10 +0200
    Re: libspring-java support Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2022-04-02 14:40 +0200
  Re: libspring-java support Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> - 2022-04-01 12:10 +0200

csiph-web