Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12027
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: gs-collections vs eclipse-collections |
| Date | Thu, 07 Jan 2021 16:20:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BuFeV-86z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <BurOG-7PT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Thu Jan 7 15:17:09 2021 |
| Old-Return-Path | <tmancill@gmail.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-11.601 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -5.5 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=yqoC9B2r1ZgT5tUrGK6V2NVewUWI0B0FSniaa1W4Usw=; b=frCwn566mIVR8symIwxvt2tjnX0VteBdkbdXBlgk7wI4HVcxrIvOEL5Knozr4/nuM5 ipvtpNpbUNnEfZ8QB0qtAOAn7+Ux8NwKfOY7kxrKCEvraTS0VU045mK2MTddcIU6OSuJ B7V3JU5Ntdoqqm0rH/EWfQGOy1qrbHsfWxfaU01INou+uCGzb44clHuZWjXE8bAPM/On zg3y9YES4V9y5kIlTEPUBvnda0jRG+dkW+7sIDd9SggFugc5LdVUlbeZdwfrUcCBnMh0 YPoRTh8uShUozNRi0w5T5vTv9y0kVhOjEvXG8ftgzIa/sK6edxl1p/obdAIqJhq12ZRr LCng== |
| X-Google-Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=yqoC9B2r1ZgT5tUrGK6V2NVewUWI0B0FSniaa1W4Usw=; b=ZS+rNqDDISccvYvBSookqslynIUFppiYNtJtJDryH2SK6T/pmM1YLjx02p35tx1AmQ oZLh7rZOWl0bSbA33muPWQzyedPoWxLJQs5WXPFX5R2quISYFzaxWNtRw5RM63SDziIw /XnaBx9P1mzSoMKqz6bKUJfveyMPF6yU8JKIk8CzzpV6hTahfpYCYiLf6qNXHZAR+SX0 ZsMFItpI50u5r/8NdWVmsVtmTLbEx98BGmyoVsXWtiTH2XGtU8JefFcVj4KE84rsjoBA 0Y25MjlgoPaXBHNkBXm1BSdUW+2TVVvr/E1qGlzmCEmBxsHWRyXnhqYU0cugfIvZHiaJ gQTQ== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AOAM533q1dxlEnxk5znKdbQR37eyfgiI6pOky5DP4FGXRwelMv1kjLA+ rJoZbmXschjEAJMtsYYXCfo= |
| X-Google-SMTP-Source | ABdhPJy/UgHrOlHtPdc0STtFyu1kTu7FdLZNQ5CM1P8Lvcv6GCXtR8I0VUEnZFkeOhGdJ87QnBcKew== |
| X-Received | by 2002:a63:b4a:: with SMTP id a10mr2294458pgl.112.1610032612954; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 07:16:52 -0800 (PST) |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5tjw36ndiiz332e" |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/22654 |
| List-ID | <debian-java.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20210107151650.cdpapdvrez4xuy6n@lark |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 67 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | Debian Java <debian-java@lists.debian.org> |
| X-Original-Date | Thu, 7 Jan 2021 07:16:50 -0800 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <20210107151650.cdpapdvrez4xuy6n@lark> |
| X-Original-References | <4cdb6f00-6068-79ec-42c0-8c54938055be@free.fr> |
| X-Original-Sender | tony mancill <tmancill@gmail.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12027 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi Vincent, On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 01:56:41AM +0100, Vincent Prat wrote: > Dear all, > > The latest version of NatTable (2.0.0) depends on Eclipse Collections > (https://www.eclipse.org/collections/). > Originally, it was called GS Collections, and was renamed when it > migrated to the Eclipse Foundation. > GS Collections is present in Debian (as gs-collections: > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gs-collections), but not Eclipse Collections. > > Should we package Eclipse Collections as a separate project (in which > case I will submit an ITP bug), or update and rename the existing package? > For your information, the package gs-collections has no reverse > dependency and has not been updated since September 2017. I see either choice as acceptable, but my suggestion is to update the existing package (and rename it only if you think it is necessary). It is the evolution of (and thus an update to) gs-collections. This approach means you don't have to go through NEW, we don't have to introduce a new package to archive, and developers who know the software by gs-collections will still find it. Even if there aren't r-deps in Debian, perhaps a downstream is using gs-collections and will benefit from the update without a rename. If you decide to create a new source package for eclipse-collections, please also take the time to RM gs-collections. We don't need to keep the old package around if we have a compatible replacement. (I'm assuming that eclipse-collections is a drop-in replacement, or nearly so - maybe just a Java package name change?) > Best wishes for the new year Same to you! Cheers, tony
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
gs-collections vs eclipse-collections Vincent Prat <vinceprat@free.fr> - 2021-01-07 02:00 +0100
Re: gs-collections vs eclipse-collections tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2021-01-07 16:20 +0100
Re: gs-collections vs eclipse-collections Vincent Prat <vinceprat@free.fr> - 2021-01-07 19:20 +0100
Re: gs-collections vs eclipse-collections tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2021-01-07 21:10 +0100
Re: gs-collections vs eclipse-collections Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2021-01-16 12:10 +0100
csiph-web