Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12027

Re: gs-collections vs eclipse-collections

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: gs-collections vs eclipse-collections
Date Thu, 07 Jan 2021 16:20:01 +0100
Message-ID <BuFeV-86z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <BurOG-7PT-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Thu Jan 7 15:17:09 2021
Old-Return-Path <tmancill@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-11.601 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5.5
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=yqoC9B2r1ZgT5tUrGK6V2NVewUWI0B0FSniaa1W4Usw=; b=frCwn566mIVR8symIwxvt2tjnX0VteBdkbdXBlgk7wI4HVcxrIvOEL5Knozr4/nuM5 ipvtpNpbUNnEfZ8QB0qtAOAn7+Ux8NwKfOY7kxrKCEvraTS0VU045mK2MTddcIU6OSuJ B7V3JU5Ntdoqqm0rH/EWfQGOy1qrbHsfWxfaU01INou+uCGzb44clHuZWjXE8bAPM/On zg3y9YES4V9y5kIlTEPUBvnda0jRG+dkW+7sIDd9SggFugc5LdVUlbeZdwfrUcCBnMh0 YPoRTh8uShUozNRi0w5T5vTv9y0kVhOjEvXG8ftgzIa/sK6edxl1p/obdAIqJhq12ZRr LCng==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=yqoC9B2r1ZgT5tUrGK6V2NVewUWI0B0FSniaa1W4Usw=; b=ZS+rNqDDISccvYvBSookqslynIUFppiYNtJtJDryH2SK6T/pmM1YLjx02p35tx1AmQ oZLh7rZOWl0bSbA33muPWQzyedPoWxLJQs5WXPFX5R2quISYFzaxWNtRw5RM63SDziIw /XnaBx9P1mzSoMKqz6bKUJfveyMPF6yU8JKIk8CzzpV6hTahfpYCYiLf6qNXHZAR+SX0 ZsMFItpI50u5r/8NdWVmsVtmTLbEx98BGmyoVsXWtiTH2XGtU8JefFcVj4KE84rsjoBA 0Y25MjlgoPaXBHNkBXm1BSdUW+2TVVvr/E1qGlzmCEmBxsHWRyXnhqYU0cugfIvZHiaJ gQTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State AOAM533q1dxlEnxk5znKdbQR37eyfgiI6pOky5DP4FGXRwelMv1kjLA+ rJoZbmXschjEAJMtsYYXCfo=
X-Google-SMTP-Source ABdhPJy/UgHrOlHtPdc0STtFyu1kTu7FdLZNQ5CM1P8Lvcv6GCXtR8I0VUEnZFkeOhGdJ87QnBcKew==
X-Received by 2002:a63:b4a:: with SMTP id a10mr2294458pgl.112.1610032612954; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 07:16:52 -0800 (PST)
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5tjw36ndiiz332e"
Content-Disposition inline
X-Mailing-List <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/22654
List-ID <debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20210107151650.cdpapdvrez4xuy6n@lark
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 67
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc Debian Java <debian-java@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Thu, 7 Jan 2021 07:16:50 -0800
X-Original-Message-ID <20210107151650.cdpapdvrez4xuy6n@lark>
X-Original-References <4cdb6f00-6068-79ec-42c0-8c54938055be@free.fr>
X-Original-Sender tony mancill <tmancill@gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12027

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Vincent,

On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 01:56:41AM +0100, Vincent Prat wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> The latest version of NatTable (2.0.0) depends on Eclipse Collections
> (https://www.eclipse.org/collections/).
> Originally, it was called GS Collections, and was renamed when it
> migrated to the Eclipse Foundation.
> GS Collections is present in Debian (as gs-collections:
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gs-collections), but not Eclipse Collections.
> 
> Should we package Eclipse Collections as a separate project (in which
> case I will submit an ITP bug), or update and rename the existing package?
> For your information, the package gs-collections has no reverse
> dependency and has not been updated since September 2017.

I see either choice as acceptable, but my suggestion is to update
the existing package (and rename it only if you think it is necessary).
It is the evolution of (and thus an update to) gs-collections.  This
approach means you don't have to go through NEW, we don't have to
introduce a new package to archive, and developers who know the software
by gs-collections will still find it.  Even if there aren't r-deps in
Debian, perhaps a downstream is using gs-collections and will benefit
from the update without a rename.

If you decide to create a new source package for eclipse-collections,
please also take the time to RM gs-collections.  We don't need to keep
the old package around if we have a compatible replacement.  (I'm
assuming that eclipse-collections is a drop-in replacement, or nearly so
- maybe just a Java package name change?)

> Best wishes for the new year

Same to you!

Cheers,
tony

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

gs-collections vs eclipse-collections Vincent Prat <vinceprat@free.fr> - 2021-01-07 02:00 +0100
  Re: gs-collections vs eclipse-collections tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2021-01-07 16:20 +0100
    Re: gs-collections vs eclipse-collections Vincent Prat <vinceprat@free.fr> - 2021-01-07 19:20 +0100
      Re: gs-collections vs eclipse-collections tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2021-01-07 21:10 +0100
  Re: gs-collections vs eclipse-collections Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2021-01-16 12:10 +0100

csiph-web