Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.boot > #77536

Bug#1136620: finish-install: Binaries fail to reproduce due to future timestamp in changelog

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> writes:

> (The git commit seems even weirder:
>   - changelog: Sat, 07 Mar 2026 23:33:26 +0100
>   - git metadata: Sat Mar 7 21:20:18 2026 +0100)
>

I bet that someone rebased their local changes, sqashed a commit with
the changelog entry from 23:33:26 onto a previous commit with
"21:20:18", and then rebased again with --committer-date-is-author-date.

> ((The git repo also features a 1.248 tag that probably doesn't belong
>   there.))

I wonder if 1.248 points to a history that is noncontiguous with the
master branch?  On the qt-kde team I recently pushed one of these when I
discovered that I had forgotten to push my (uploaded to the archive)
work...so I had to rebase onto the salsa copy and my tag became a...what
is the correct term?  Shadow HEAD? ;)

Best,
Nicholas

Back to linux.debian.maint.boot | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Bug#1136620: finish-install: Binaries fail to reproduce due to future timestamp in changelog gamer191 <gamer191.githubuser@gmail.com> - 2026-05-14 03:10 +0200
  Bug#1136620: finish-install: Binaries fail to reproduce due to future timestamp in changelog Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> - 2026-05-15 21:20 +0200
    Bug#1136620: finish-install: Binaries fail to reproduce due to future timestamp in changelog Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2026-05-15 22:00 +0200
      Bug#1136620: finish-install: Binaries fail to reproduce due to future timestamp in changelog Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2026-05-15 22:50 +0200
      Bug#1136620: finish-install: Binaries fail to reproduce due to future timestamp in changelog Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> - 2026-05-16 00:20 +0200

csiph-web