Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > linux.debian.legal

linux.debian.legal

2417 articles, 578 threads (numbers 4146 – 6586) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
In Support of Debian’s Independence & Sovereignty: A Plea to Resist AB 1043 Compliance george.patriot@tutamail.com 2026-04-30 07:00 +0200
 
Re: Icons for proprietary software in contrib package Ilya Orlov <ilyaorlov124@gmail.com> 2026-04-19 11:50 +0200
 
Icons for proprietary software in contrib package (3 replies) Ilya Orlov <ilyaorlov124@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 21:20 +0200
   → Re: Icons for proprietary software in contrib package Xavier <yadd@debian.org> 2026-04-16 21:50 +0200
     → Re: Icons for proprietary software in contrib package Ilya Orlov <ilyaorlov124@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 09:10 +0200
       → Re: Icons for proprietary software in contrib package Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> 2026-04-18 06:30 +0200
 
SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? (11 replies) Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> 2026-01-29 04:20 +0100
   → Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> 2026-01-29 07:00 +0100
   → Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk> 2026-01-29 10:50 +0100
     → Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Daniel Hakimi <dan.j.hakimi@gmail.com> 2026-01-29 14:00 +0100
     → Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> 2026-01-30 00:20 +0100
       → Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com> 2026-01-30 19:50 +0100
       → Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Gioele Barabucci <gioele@svario.it> 2026-02-13 21:30 +0100
         → Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> 2026-02-13 21:40 +0100
           → Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Gioele Barabucci <gioele@svario.it> 2026-02-13 22:10 +0100
           → Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> 2026-04-17 00:40 +0200
             → Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> 2026-04-18 06:20 +0200
   → Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Changwoo Ryu <cwryu@debian.org> 2026-02-14 19:50 +0100
 
Non-DFSG license in build files (1 reply) Moshe Piekarski <debian.development@melachim.net> 2026-04-15 02:10 +0200
   → Re: Non-DFSG license in build files Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> 2026-04-15 02:30 +0200
 
On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states (29 replies) Aaron Rainbolt <arraybolt3@gmail.com> 2026-03-01 20:50 +0100
   → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states "Vincent F. Heuser Jr." <vheuser@heuserlawoffice.com> 2026-03-01 21:40 +0100
     → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt <arraybolt3@gmail.com> 2026-03-01 21:50 +0100
       → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states "Vincent F. Heuser Jr." <vheuser@heuserlawoffice.com> 2026-03-01 22:50 +0100
       → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt <arraybolt3@gmail.com> 2026-03-01 23:20 +0100
       → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Jamie Null <lav@lavender.earth> 2026-03-01 23:30 +0100
       → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states "Vincent F. Heuser Jr." <vheuser@heuserlawoffice.com> 2026-04-06 21:20 +0200
   → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states David Edmundson <david@davidedmundson.co.uk> 2026-03-01 21:50 +0100
     → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt <arraybolt3@gmail.com> 2026-03-01 22:00 +0100
   → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt <arraybolt3@gmail.com> 2026-03-01 22:30 +0100
   → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Stephan Verbücheln <verbuecheln@posteo.de> 2026-03-02 08:10 +0100
     → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt <arraybolt3@gmail.com> 2026-03-04 01:40 +0100
   → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt <arraybolt3@gmail.com> 2026-03-04 01:50 +0100
   → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Moritz Schlarb <moschlar@debian.org> 2026-03-04 09:10 +0100
   → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> 2026-03-04 23:50 +0100
   → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt <arraybolt3@gmail.com> 2026-03-06 02:50 +0100
   → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt <arraybolt3@gmail.com> 2026-03-10 03:20 +0100
   → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Lucas Holt <luke@foolishgames.com> 2026-03-10 03:50 +0100
   → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Artur Manuel <amadaluzia@disroot.org> 2026-03-10 04:40 +0100
   → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Jamie Null <lav@lavender.earth> 2026-03-11 05:20 +0100
     → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Adenix NPSP <adenixnpsp@gmail.com> 2026-03-11 05:20 +0100
     → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org> 2026-03-25 02:20 +0100
       → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt <arraybolt3@gmail.com> 2026-03-25 02:30 +0100
       → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> 2026-03-25 13:10 +0100
         → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> 2026-03-25 14:00 +0100
         → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> 2026-03-25 14:00 +0100
   → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> 2026-03-13 18:30 +0100
   → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt <arraybolt3@gmail.com> 2026-03-17 00:40 +0100
     → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Adenix NPSP <adenixnpsp@gmail.com> 2026-03-17 00:50 +0100
   → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Toni Mueller <toni@debian.org> 2026-04-06 17:50 +0200
 
Potential Financing Support for Your Project Saudi Investors Group <mpesakanye@gmail.com> 2026-03-30 15:00 +0200
 
License conditions for a specific file in praat (7 replies) Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> 2026-03-17 16:00 +0100
   → Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat Michael Stehmann <michael@canzeley.de> 2026-03-17 18:00 +0100
     → Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> 2026-03-17 19:20 +0100
       → Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat Michael Stehmann <michael@canzeley.de> 2026-03-17 19:40 +0100
         → Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> 2026-03-17 19:50 +0100
           → Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> 2026-03-18 11:20 +0100
             → Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> 2026-03-18 18:40 +0100
           → Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> 2026-03-18 19:00 +0100
 
On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states (3 replies) FloofyWolf <debian-devel-list@floofywolf.net> 2026-03-04 06:20 +0100
   → Re: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states "Personal (disroot.org)" <amadaluzia@disroot.org> 2026-03-04 13:40 +0100
     → Re: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states Adenix NPSP <adenixnpsp@gmail.com> 2026-03-17 22:10 +0100
       → Re: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states Jamie Null <lav@lavender.earth> 2026-03-17 23:10 +0100
 
GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project (7 replies) "Carl Keinath" <carl.keinath@gmail.com> 2026-03-15 11:10 +0100
   → Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> 2026-03-16 20:20 +0100
     → Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> 2026-03-16 20:50 +0100
       → Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project Luke Faraone <lfaraone@debian.org> 2026-03-16 22:50 +0100
         → Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> 2026-03-17 07:50 +0100
           → Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> 2026-03-17 11:20 +0100
             → Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project Michael Stehmann <michael@canzeley.de> 2026-03-17 17:40 +0100
       → Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> 2026-03-16 23:30 +0100
 
ansible-runner: guidance requested on possible Apache-2.0/GPL-3.0 incompatibility (2 replies) Sakirnth Nagarasa <sakirnth@gmail.com> 2026-03-14 11:40 +0100
   → Re: ansible-runner: guidance requested on possible Apache-2.0/GPL-3.0 incompatibility Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> 2026-03-14 19:10 +0100
     → Re: ansible-runner: guidance requested on possible Apache-2.0/GPL-3.0 incompatibility Sakirnth Nagarasa <sakirnth@gmail.com> 2026-03-16 21:10 +0100
 
ansible-runner: guidance requested on possible Apache-2.0/GPL-3.0 incompatibility Sakirnth Nagarasa <sakirnth@gmail.com> 2026-03-14 11:40 +0100
 
Age Verification (5 replies) Shaugn Nell <shaugn.nell@gmail.com> 2026-03-11 22:40 +0100
   → Re: Age Verification "Vincent F. Heuser Jr." <vheuser@heuserlawoffice.com> 2026-03-11 23:00 +0100
     → Re: Age Verification Adenix NPSP <adenixnpsp@gmail.com> 2026-03-11 23:10 +0100
     → Re: Age Verification Jamie Null <lav@lavender.earth> 2026-03-12 01:10 +0100
       → Re: Age Verification Adenix NPSP <adenixnpsp@gmail.com> 2026-03-12 01:20 +0100
         → Re: Age Verification Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org> 2026-03-12 23:10 +0100
 
Re: Age Verification Adenix NPSP <adenixnpsp@gmail.com> 2026-03-11 22:30 +0100
 
Re: Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Adenix NPSP <adenixnpsp@gmail.com> 2026-03-04 23:10 +0100
 
Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states (1 reply) Adenix NPSP <adenixnpsp@gmail.com> 2026-03-04 17:10 +0100
   → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states "Vincent F. Heuser Jr." <vheuser@heuserlawoffice.com> 2026-03-04 20:50 +0100
 
Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states (1 reply) Aaron Rainbolt <arraybolt3@gmail.com> 2026-03-01 21:20 +0100
   → Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt <arraybolt3@gmail.com> 2026-03-01 22:10 +0100
 
Distribution of CDDL binaries in contrib (1 reply) Jarl Gullberg <jarl.gullberg@visar-systems.com> 2026-02-28 19:10 +0100
   → Re: Distribution of CDDL binaries in contrib Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> 2026-02-28 20:20 +0100
 
Updating the PHP license (13 replies) Ben Ramsey <ben@benramsey.com> 2024-05-18 22:20 +0200
   → Re: Updating the PHP license "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> 2024-05-18 23:00 +0200
   → Re: Updating the PHP license Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> 2024-05-19 18:50 +0200
     → Re: Updating the PHP license Ben Ramsey <ben@benramsey.com> 2024-05-19 22:00 +0200
       → Re: Updating the PHP license Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> 2024-05-21 23:40 +0200
         → Re: Updating the PHP license Ben Ramsey <ben@benramsey.com> 2024-05-22 03:00 +0200
           → Re: Updating the PHP license Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> 2024-05-23 20:50 +0200
             → Re: Updating the PHP license Ben Ramsey <ben@benramsey.com> 2024-05-24 07:20 +0200
               → Re: Updating the PHP license Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> 2024-05-25 17:10 +0200
                 → Re: Updating the PHP license Ben Ramsey <ben@benramsey.com> 2024-05-25 18:00 +0200
           → Re: Updating the PHP license Ben Ramsey <ben@benramsey.com> 2024-05-23 06:20 +0200
       → Re: Updating the PHP license Ben Ramsey <ben@benramsey.com> 2024-05-22 03:00 +0200
   → Re: Updating the PHP license Ben Ramsey <ben@benramsey.com> 2026-02-27 06:20 +0100
     → Re: Updating the PHP license Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> 2026-02-28 00:00 +0100
 
Re: Software implementing patented techniques (5 replies) Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> 2026-02-10 12:20 +0100
   → Re: Software implementing patented techniques Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> 2026-02-10 17:30 +0100
     → Re: Software implementing patented techniques Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> 2026-02-14 20:50 +0100
       → Re: Software implementing patented techniques Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> 2026-02-14 21:50 +0100
         → Re: Software implementing patented techniques Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> 2026-02-14 22:50 +0100
           → Re: Software implementing patented techniques Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> 2026-02-15 16:40 +0100

~Page 1 of ~29 (articles 6505–6586) Older →

csiph-web