Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #50506 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 6/6] MIPS: net: BPF: Introduce BPF ASM helpers

Started byAurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
First post2015-08-13 23:10 +0200
Last post2015-08-14 10:00 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 6/6] MIPS: net: BPF: Introduce BPF ASM helpers Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> - 2015-08-13 23:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 6/6] MIPS: net: BPF: Introduce BPF ASM helpers Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> - 2015-08-14 10:00 +0200

#50506 — Re: [PATCH 6/6] MIPS: net: BPF: Introduce BPF ASM helpers

FromAurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Date2015-08-13 23:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/6] MIPS: net: BPF: Introduce BPF ASM helpers
Message-ID<pX7BL-62s-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 2015-06-04 11:56, Markos Chandras wrote:
> This commit introduces BPF ASM helpers for MIPS and MIPS64 kernels.
> The purpose of this patch is to twofold:
> 
> 1) We are now able to handle negative offsets instead of either
> falling back to the interpreter or to simply not do anything and
> bail out.
> 
> 2) Optimize reads from the packet header instead of calling the C
> helpers
> 
> Because of this patch, we are now able to get rid of quite a bit of
> code in the JIT generation process by using MIPS optimized assembly
> code. The new assembly code makes the test_bpf testsuite happy with
> all 60 test passing successfully compared to the previous
> implementation where 2 tests were failing.
> Doing some basic analysis in the results between the old
> implementation and the new one we can obtain the following
> summary running current mainline on an ER8 board (+/- 30us delta is
> ignored to prevent noise from kernel scheduling or IRQ latencies):
> 
> Summary: 22 tests are faster, 7 are slower and 47 saw no improvement
> 
> with the most notable improvement being the tcpdump tests. The 7 tests
> that seem to be a bit slower is because they all follow the slow path
> (bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper) which is meant to be slow so
> that's not a problem.
> 
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
> ---
> I have uploaded the script and the bpf result files in my LMO webspace
> in case you want to have a look. I didn't paste them in here because they
> are nearly 200 lines. Simply download all 3 files and run './bpf_analysis.py'

This patch relies on R2 instructions, and thus the Linux kernel fails to
build when targetting non-R2 CPUs. See for example:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=linux&arch=mipsel&ver=4.2%7Erc6-1%7Eexp1&stamp=1439480000

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#50510

FromMarkos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
Date2015-08-14 10:00 +0200
Message-ID<pXi4b-4fw-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#50506
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:42:46PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> 
> This patch relies on R2 instructions, and thus the Linux kernel fails to
> build when targetting non-R2 CPUs. See for example:
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=linux&arch=mipsel&ver=4.2%7Erc6-1%7Eexp1&stamp=1439480000
> 
> -- 
> Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
> aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net
Hi,

I think Ralf may have a fix for R1 cores but I am not sure about the status of
that patch. Ralf?

-- 
markos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web