Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	m.silentcreek@gmail.com
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject	Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard
Date	Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:10:03 +0200
Message-ID	<pPLmH-7cG-37@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<pPuYx-en-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPIf8-2Nv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPIyt-3am-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPJuz-4vX-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPJNV-4T4-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPK7g-5uX-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPKgV-5Gn-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPKJY-6e8-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>
Old-Return-Path	<debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
X-Spam-Flag	NO
X-Spam-Score	-3.787
Reply-To	m.silentcreek@gmail.com, 793185@bugs.debian.org
Resent-To	debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc	Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
X-Debian-Pr-Message	followup 793185
X-Debian-Pr-Package	src:linux
X-Debian-Pr-Source	linux
X-Spam-Bayes	score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 27; hammy, 149; neutral, 77; spammy, 1. spammytokens:0.986-+--H*c:HHH hammytokens:0.000-+--sk:config_, 0.000-+--sk:CONFIG_, 0.000-+--cpufreq, 0.000-+--UD:github.com, 0.000-+--github.com
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-type; bh=pS6IzcaAXmxN42gko3qqYU6dZNJMCuebLk2Qk4XdBzk=; b=bfapLNvxWnRm9PgzRbFlpScyM9hu7LElHCgLRcE0P033/M+hZFzI25pThkvTxdw6aA 4JmMMNAu2keY5dvxGD+GINGbRVieBryiLhnLg7tTvgCXfgTuE90GkvT2a4TEOoXePvua FT+XWoTYz6do21WrxRqb2j+CboXeDbme9vQL+5QEniKZ4j4e+IsvAligKJcD6m3fWTrk 1DxW1YBssl6YwAWx7sqf6pf1XmLVtINDBg7IYcCUY3lbHCOfT4sGY1v4d6MfvUfzAVY5 B/UuigBoyy741OTHjkHqk34wHnNy6vyGqqbJ8kX0p71ony/ox6TWiGQKzi5pkvVw15cY yz5w==
X-Received	by 10.140.101.22 with SMTP id t22mr270766qge.32.1437742714291; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 05:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Web-Client	true
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_564_1426210387.1437742714134"
X-Google-Token	EPrsyK0FQ_ABfDr0mz80
X-Google-IP	2a03:db80:4810:8200:0:0:0:10
X-Debian-Message	from BTS
X-Mailing-List	<debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1193506
List-ID	<debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<http://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist/>
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	34
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	793185@bugs.debian.org, leonardo.canducci@gmail.com, hdegoede@redhat.com, maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, thomas.kaiser@phg-online.de
X-Original-Date	Fri, 24 Jul 2015 05:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-Message-ID	<a0fe4403-d40e-496e-a375-a80e66be0ef4@googlegroups.com>
X-Original-References	<736b90b4-b000-4a79-817a-5e1b5c3605f3@googlegroups.com> <46ac4df1-b633-4244-8822-45be844af143@googlegroups.com> <55B21435.5040506@redhat.com> <e1b45ad6-6ea1-4ced-aa40-735aafcb91bf@googlegroups.com> <20150724115004.GD2564@lukather> <d01743f1-3513-4c44-8bcf-d3af19b801e0@googlegroups.com> <6c78647c-4d92-476c-a692-ee048cbce8ab@googlegroups.com> <2b493541-bf0d-4d60-a830-396b70a7ce95@googlegroups.com>
Xref	aioe.org linux.debian.bugs.dist:666856 linux.debian.kernel:50280

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Am Freitag, 24. Juli 2015 14:49:42 UTC+2 schrieb Thomas Kaiser:
> Ah, now I think I understand. You're talking about these lines here?
> 
> 
>     https://github.com/RobertCNelson/u-boot/blob/master/arch/arm/dts/sun7i-a20-cubietruck.dts#L244-L269
>
Yes. 
> 
> So while using CONFIG_REGULATOR_AXP20X=y will bring working cpufreq support to the cubietruck, shouldn't adding these lines to the device trees of the other 5 A20 devices enable CPU voltage scaling there?

Basically yes. The point that Chen-Yu made is that he and other developers don't have all boards available to verify that all of these boards use the same layout for their wiring. Therefore they just leave these bits out. I'm actually working on a small patch to add these regulator bits to the BananaPi and possibly BananaPro dts files. I will post it soon, when I gathered enough information to ensure everything works fine. But anyway, we're getting offtopic here. So let's postpone this discussion until then.

Cheers,

Timo

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> - 2015-07-24 12:40 +0200
  Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2015-07-24 14:00 +0200
    Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2015-07-24 14:30 +0200
    Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard m.silentcreek@gmail.com - 2015-07-24 14:30 +0200
      Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> - 2015-07-24 15:40 +0200
        Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> - 2015-07-25 17:10 +0200
          Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org> - 2015-07-25 17:40 +0200
            Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> - 2015-07-30 10:00 +0200
              Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org> - 2015-08-01 12:00 +0200
        Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard Leonardo Canducci <leonardo.canducci@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 17:10 +0200
      Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> - 2015-07-24 15:40 +0200
        Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2015-07-24 16:10 +0200
      Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2015-07-24 15:40 +0200
      Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2015-07-24 15:40 +0200
      Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard m.silentcreek@gmail.com - 2015-07-24 16:10 +0200

csiph-web