Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #88404

Re: Uploading linux (6.12.37-1)

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi kernel and ftp teams,

Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2025-07-10):
> I would like to upload next version of the 6.12.y stable series to
> unstable, which will be 6.12.37-1, though depending on an ack/nack
> from SRM and/or debian-boot.

That was ACK'd and uploaded, but we're still lacking linux-signed-arm64:
it's in NEW, and it'd be great to have it accepted.

> The update contains in particular the mitigations for the Transitive
> Scheduler Attacks (TSA) (CVE-2024-36350, CVE-2024-36357). To be
> effective, they require both the support in kernel as a corresponding
> amd64-microcode update (thus Henrique to check if that would be
> possible to upload to unstable and let migrate to trixie).

I haven't seen any update on the amd64-microcode side, but I hope it's
not going to block src:linux* migration to testing, and to “only” make
the kernel-side fixes insufficient on their own?

> Apart from the stable import, there are pending two packaging changes.
> 
>    * Revert "cgroup: Do not report unavailable v1 controllers in
>      /proc/cgroups" (Closes: #1108294)
> 
> The revert commit from Ben Hutchings explains the situation:
> | For compatibility with older versions of OpenJDK, we need to keep
> | listing the cpuset and memory controllers in /proc/cgroups even
> | though they no longer support the cgroups v1 API.
> https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/commit/4c797eb8f8e2c6074c707cd906a452a2167bc67f
> (we asked upstream if that can be officially reverted, but we guess we
> will need to ship this patch indepently for trixie's lifecycle).
> 
>   * rtw89: Enable RTW89_8851BE, RTW89_8852BTE as modules (Closes: #1108965)
> 
> Adds support for instance for the Realtek 8851BE WiFi chip.
> 
> As full freeze is approaching I will defintively wait a bit on this
> upload before hearing back.

Given https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2025/07/msg00500.html
I think we might stay with 6.12.37-1 for 13.0, at least in theory?

I'm happy to still consider newer linux versions if you decide we need
to ship this or that bugfix ASAP, so feel free to sync with me regarding
feasibility!


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Uploading linux (6.12.37-1) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-07-10 22:20 +0200
  Re: Uploading linux (6.12.37-1) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2025-07-10 23:30 +0200
  Re: Uploading linux (6.12.37-1) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2025-07-14 18:40 +0200
    Re: Uploading linux (6.12.37-1) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-07-16 07:50 +0200
      Re: Uploading linux (6.12.37-1) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2025-07-16 08:20 +0200
        Re: Uploading linux (6.12.37-1) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-07-16 09:20 +0200

csiph-web