Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.doc > #7883
| From | Carlos Peralta <carlos9178028@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.doc |
| Subject | Re: An idea for organizing the documentation: A 3-section approach |
| Date | 2026-05-03 22:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MQLBT-2mrb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <MQvGN-2bqj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MQDbj-2gFA-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi everyone, Thank you for the detailed feedback. You made some excellent points that helped me see the broader picture of the project. differnet groups need different things. i think you only focused on the first category. You are completely right. I was narrowly focusing on first-time Linux users. After reflecting on your feedback, I realize that dividing the documentation by "Experience Levels" or "User Pathways" might be a much better approach than a monolithic structure. For example, having distinct entry points for: First-time Linux users (coming from Windows/macOS). Users migrating from other distros. Advanced users setting up servers or using debootstrap. one question here is: should this be separate, or should the installer make it so obvious this isnt needed Ideally, the installer should be entirely self-explanatory. However, documentation serves as the essential safety net for edge cases or for users who want to understand the "why" behind the process, rather than just clicking "Next". why advertise non-free software here? My intention is absolutely not to advertise or promote non-free software over free alternatives. However, from a newcomer's perspective, hardware compatibility (like Wi-Fi cards or Nvidia GPUs) is often the biggest wall. Providing clear, official guidance on how to enable non-free-firmware or non-free components when strictly necessary prevents users from getting frustrated and abandoning Debian simply because their hardware doesn't work out of the box. this seems rather niche... this doesnt sounds like documentation. I concede both points. You are right that the Developer and Volunteer sections fall more into project management and internal wiki domains rather than standard system documentation. I will drop those ideas and focus solely on the user onboarding experience for now. maybe start with: what learning do you want readers to take? The main goal is independence: giving users the exact knowledge they need to manage their system confidently at their current experience level. Tomorrow I will be spending time reading through the current wiki and official pages to get a better feel for the existing flow and see if I can help with Spanish translations or fixing syntax errors I've noticed, rather than trying to reorganize everything at once. Thanks again for guiding me in the right direction! Best regards, Carlos El dom, 3 de may de 2026, 06:20, Richard Lewis < richard.lewis.debian@googlemail.com> escribió: > Carlos Peralta <carlos9178028@gmail.com> writes: > > > Hi everyone, > > As a new user getting involved in the project, I have been thinking > about > > how the documentation is presented. I would like to share an idea for > > structuring it into three main sections to make it more intuitive, > > especially for newcomers. > > It's good to think about the user of documentation before the structure > > > > Here is what I have in mind: > > 1. Users Section > > This would be the starting point for anyone installing Debian. > > Here we need to be careful - "anyone" installing debian includes > > - people who have never used linux (only used windows/android/iphone/etc) > - people who have used other linux distributions (many sub-categories) > - people who have used debian, and just bought a new computer/are > re-installing > - people who have used debian, and are setting up a server > - people using debootstrap or similar > - people testing the installation process > - probably others > > differnet groups need different things. i think you only focused on the > first category. > > > It could > > cover: > > Installation: Step-by-step guides for both GUI and CLI (Command Line > > Interface). A key addition would be explaining exactly what each command > > does during the CLI installation. > > one question here is: should this be separate, or should the installer > make it so obvious this isnt needed > > > > System Management: Basic commands for updating the system, > > downloading/installing software, and how to properly add proprietary > > (non-free) software. > > Terminal Basics: A brief guide on how to navigate the terminal. > > why advertise non-free software here? > > > > 2. Developers Section > > This section would dive into the technical side of the OS: > > Deep dive documentation into the Debian codebase. > > A comprehensive guide on how to create a custom distribution based on > > Debian. > > this seems rather niche, especially given your section 1. And > "developers" is v broad > > > 3. Volunteers / Contributors Section > > A dedicated space to organize the community effort: > > this doesnt sounds like documentation. i think you could maybe meant > this to be information about debian as a project? documentation cannot > realistically do all the things you list below > > > A clear breakdown of the different areas that currently need help. > > good luck identifying this! > > > > An explanation of what each area does and how to execute the tasks > > required. > > this is a very mechanical framing > > > Clear instructions or a sign-up process for those who want to support a > > specific team. > > I understand Debian already has a massive amount of documentation, but I > > thought a unified structure like this could make the learning curve much > > smoother. > > maybe start with: what learning do you want readers to take? > > > I would love to hear your thoughts on this approach or if there is > already > > an ongoing effort similar to this that I can help with! > > As well as the user, i would encourage you to think about what the > purpose and scope of any documentation is: there are definiely some > things that should be considered when writing all documentation > (audience, purpose, assumptions, etc), but a unified structure seems > unlikely: would you try and impose a unified sturcture on code? > >
Back to linux.debian.doc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
An idea for organizing the documentation: A 3-section approach Carlos Peralta <carlos9178028@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 05:30 +0200
Re: An idea for organizing the documentation: A 3-section approach Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2026-05-03 08:50 +0200
Re: An idea for organizing the documentation: A 3-section approach Joost van Baal-Ilić <joostvb-debian@mdcc.cx> - 2026-05-03 09:50 +0200
Re: An idea for organizing the documentation: A 3-section approach Richard Lewis <richard.lewis.debian@googlemail.com> - 2026-05-03 13:30 +0200
Re: An idea for organizing the documentation: A 3-section approach Carlos Peralta <carlos9178028@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 22:30 +0200
csiph-web