Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.doc > #7832
| From | Alma Madeleine <AlMa1@ro.ru> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.doc |
| Subject | Re: Documentation inconsistency: default umask in Securing Debian Manual online vs. actual default on trixie |
| Date | 2025-12-09 23:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <M0eGR-1FAi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <M06gi-1A2t-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> Status: Published; very outdated, no updates of content since many > years. The date of the PDF file is 01.06.24, 22:53:17. So folks have been at least recompiling the document. If the document is outdated and no longer reflects the reality, the file should be taken offline or prominently marked as outdated, say, on the very first page. As of now, the word “outdated“ doesn't even occur in the English document (or at least not findable in evince).
Back to linux.debian.doc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Documentation inconsistency: default umask in Securing Debian Manual online vs. actual default on trixie sebul <sebuls@gmail.com> - 2025-12-09 14:50 +0100 Re: Documentation inconsistency: default umask in Securing Debian Manual online vs. actual default on trixie Alma Madeleine <AlMa1@ro.ru> - 2025-12-09 23:50 +0100
csiph-web