Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel > #121735
| From | Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel |
| Subject | Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? |
| Date | 2026-04-29 12:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MP9S1-1fIs-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <MOWL7-16PQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi all, Le Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 06:38:30PM +0100, Simon McVittie a écrit : > >I agree. SPDX didn't exist at the time that copyright-format was first >designed, but now it does, and it has convenient names for a lot of >licenses. To be more precise, it was already existing when we finished DEP5, but one of the reasons we did not align with it is that it lacked a syntax for describing license exceptions. It got one since then, see https://spdx.org/licenses/exceptions-index.html. I am all for aligning more strongly with SPDX now. https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2024/09/msg00163.html Have a nice day, Charles -- Charles Plessy Nagahama, Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan Debian Med packaging team http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tooting from work, https://fediscience.org/@charles_plessy Tooting from home, https://framapiaf.org/@charles_plessy
Back to linux.debian.devel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2026-04-27 10:10 +0200
Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? "Andrea Pappacoda" <andrea@pappacoda.it> - 2026-04-27 10:50 +0200
Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2026-04-27 15:00 +0200
Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2026-04-27 15:20 +0200
Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2026-04-27 15:30 +0200
Re: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2026-04-27 17:30 +0200
Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2026-04-28 11:50 +0200
Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2026-04-27 15:10 +0200
Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? "Jonathan Dowland" <jmtd@debian.org> - 2026-04-27 16:10 +0200
Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> - 2026-04-27 18:50 +0200
Re: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 08:20 +0200
Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Agathe Porte <gagath@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 09:00 +0200
Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 09:40 +0200
Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 16:50 +0200
Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 18:00 +0200
Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 18:50 +0200
Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 19:40 +0200
Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? "Andrea Pappacoda" <andrea@pappacoda.it> - 2026-04-28 21:00 +0200
Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 22:00 +0200
Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> - 2026-04-29 12:00 +0200
csiph-web