Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the Operating system itself.

Path	csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Stephan Verbücheln <verbuecheln@posteo.de>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.devel, linux.debian.project, linux.debian.security
Subject	Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the Operating system itself.
Date	Mon, 18 Apr 2022 19:50:01 +0200
Message-ID	<EdDFD-9BGs-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<EdDFD-9BGs-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <Edhc5-9nWW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Edj4d-9p3P-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <Edj4d-9p3P-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-project@lists.debian.org, debian-security@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org Mon Apr 18 17:42:06 2022
Old-Return-Path	<verbuecheln@posteo.de>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-8.871 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -5.5
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Mailing-List	<debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/351921
List-ID	<debian-devel.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/7f84732efbb0069ea3dd03710c2ec85447427238.camel@posteo.de
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	10
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:41:46 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID	<7f84732efbb0069ea3dd03710c2ec85447427238.camel@posteo.de>
X-Original-References	<CAPCiBOS6_LLp6RHCxEma+oTKaXjhmT9FKWVOqR9t6etsRdXm9w@mail.gmail.com> <cd27db78-e65f-8b24-44a6-dd2b10f7d293@pocock.pro> <0BDBB0C6-4DB3-4C49-9EF0-60BDAAB9B6DA@gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.devel:104163 linux.debian.project:12805 linux.debian.security:6086

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

> i did the analysis (took 3 weeks)

Do you have a publication of that analysis? I was thinking the same
about the organization of Debian for some time but never did analysis
or compared it to other distros.

Also I like to add that reproducible builds are an excellent addition
to the mechanisms you are describing.

Regards

Back to linux.debian.devel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the Operating system itself. lkcl <luke.leighton@gmail.com> - 2022-04-17 21:50 +0200
  Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the  Operating system itself. Stephan Verbücheln <verbuecheln@posteo.de> - 2022-04-18 19:50 +0200
  Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the  Operating system itself. Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net> - 2022-05-23 19:30 +0200
    Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the  Operating system itself. lkcl <luke.leighton@gmail.com> - 2022-05-23 20:40 +0200
      Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the  Operating system itself. Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2022-05-23 21:00 +0200
      Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the  Operating system itself. Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net> - 2022-05-23 21:10 +0200
        Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the  Operating system itself. Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net> - 2022-05-23 21:20 +0200
        Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the  Operating system itself. lkcl <luke.leighton@gmail.com> - 2022-05-23 21:30 +0200

csiph-web