Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.devel.testing > #1206

Re: Current bullseye security and stability

From Jorge P. de Morais Neto <jorge+list@disroot.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.devel.testing
Subject Re: Current bullseye security and stability
Date 2021-01-16 17:20 +0100
Message-ID <BxWsV-4D0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <BxbaG-YY-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <BxbNo-1q7-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <Bxcq6-1Um-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Em [2021-01-14 qui 16:08:43+0100], MichaIng escreveu:

> I can only agree, running some Bullseye systems as well since Buster was 
> released, not facing any relevant issues.
> [...]

Thank you Micha and lucas.  I have then upgraded my notebook to bullseye
and so far it has been pleasant indeed.

> And as you mention "unstable"/sid: Do not use it if it's not for
> testing (I mean help testing new package implementations on a test
> system) or development reasons. It's easy to run into a dependency
> mess or that suddenly large parts of the system are upgraded to sid
> packages. It's a development playground, not meant for production
> systems. It should be pretty fine to wait until a certain software
> version has reached the "testing" (currently Bullseye) suite, where
> dependency integrity and a basic testing by maintainers has been done
> already.

So you recommend avoiding sid even for specific package minor-version
upgrades with security fixes?

The Debian wiki says otherwise.  See
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianTesting#Best_practices_for_Testing_users

I currently follow the Debian wiki advice.  I carefully monitor the list
of installed packages from unstable, to avoid unintended upgrades.

Regards

-- 
- <https://jorgemorais.gitlab.io/justice-for-rms/>
- I am Brazilian.  I hope my English is correct and I welcome feedback.
- <https://www.defectivebydesign.org/>
- <https://www.gnu.org/>

Back to linux.debian.devel.testing | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Current bullseye security and stability "Jorge P. de Morais Neto" <jorge+list@disroot.org> - 2021-01-14 14:50 +0100
  Re: Current bullseye security and stability ldavila@syt.net - 2021-01-14 15:30 +0100
    Re: Current bullseye security and stability MichaIng <micha@dietpi.com> - 2021-01-14 16:10 +0100
      Re: Current bullseye security and stability Jorge P. de Morais Neto <jorge+list@disroot.org> - 2021-01-16 17:20 +0100
        Re: Current bullseye security and stability MichaIng <micha@dietpi.com> - 2021-01-16 21:20 +0100
          Re: Current bullseye security and stability Jorge P. de Morais Neto <jorge+list@disroot.org> - 2021-01-17 00:00 +0100

csiph-web