Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel.testing > #1206
| From | Jorge P. de Morais Neto <jorge+list@disroot.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel.testing |
| Subject | Re: Current bullseye security and stability |
| Date | 2021-01-16 17:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BxWsV-4D0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <BxbaG-YY-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <BxbNo-1q7-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <Bxcq6-1Um-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Em [2021-01-14 qui 16:08:43+0100], MichaIng escreveu: > I can only agree, running some Bullseye systems as well since Buster was > released, not facing any relevant issues. > [...] Thank you Micha and lucas. I have then upgraded my notebook to bullseye and so far it has been pleasant indeed. > And as you mention "unstable"/sid: Do not use it if it's not for > testing (I mean help testing new package implementations on a test > system) or development reasons. It's easy to run into a dependency > mess or that suddenly large parts of the system are upgraded to sid > packages. It's a development playground, not meant for production > systems. It should be pretty fine to wait until a certain software > version has reached the "testing" (currently Bullseye) suite, where > dependency integrity and a basic testing by maintainers has been done > already. So you recommend avoiding sid even for specific package minor-version upgrades with security fixes? The Debian wiki says otherwise. See https://wiki.debian.org/DebianTesting#Best_practices_for_Testing_users I currently follow the Debian wiki advice. I carefully monitor the list of installed packages from unstable, to avoid unintended upgrades. Regards -- - <https://jorgemorais.gitlab.io/justice-for-rms/> - I am Brazilian. I hope my English is correct and I welcome feedback. - <https://www.defectivebydesign.org/> - <https://www.gnu.org/>
Back to linux.debian.devel.testing | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Current bullseye security and stability "Jorge P. de Morais Neto" <jorge+list@disroot.org> - 2021-01-14 14:50 +0100
Re: Current bullseye security and stability ldavila@syt.net - 2021-01-14 15:30 +0100
Re: Current bullseye security and stability MichaIng <micha@dietpi.com> - 2021-01-14 16:10 +0100
Re: Current bullseye security and stability Jorge P. de Morais Neto <jorge+list@disroot.org> - 2021-01-16 17:20 +0100
Re: Current bullseye security and stability MichaIng <micha@dietpi.com> - 2021-01-16 21:20 +0100
Re: Current bullseye security and stability Jorge P. de Morais Neto <jorge+list@disroot.org> - 2021-01-17 00:00 +0100
csiph-web