Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1292583 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-05-07 09:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2026-05-07 15:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 9 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
Bug#1135892: libtls-dev: outdated should be 4.2.1 Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> - 2026-05-07 09:40 +0200
Bug#1135892: libtls-dev: outdated should be 4.2.1 Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2026-05-07 11:30 +0200
Bug#1135892: libtls-dev: outdated should be 4.2.1 Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> - 2026-05-07 11:40 +0200
Bug#1135892: libtls-dev: outdated should be 4.2.1 Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> - 2026-05-07 11:50 +0200
Bug#1135892: libtls-dev: outdated should be 4.2.1 Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> - 2026-05-07 13:20 +0200
Bug#1135892: libtls-dev: outdated should be 4.2.1 Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> - 2026-05-07 13:50 +0200
Bug#1135892: libtls-dev: outdated should be 4.2.1 Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> - 2026-05-07 14:10 +0200
Bug#1135892: libtls-dev: outdated should be 4.2.1 Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> - 2026-05-07 14:10 +0200
Bug#1135892: libtls-dev: outdated should be 4.2.1 Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> - 2026-05-07 15:40 +0200
| From | Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-05-07 09:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1135892: libtls-dev: outdated should be 4.2.1 |
| Message-ID | <MS1uW-3dTz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Package: libtls-dev Version: 3.8.1-2.1+b2 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j.klemkow@wemelug.de Dear Maintainer, * What outcome did you expect instead? An update of libtls-dev to the last stable upstream release 4.2.1 of libtls. Thanks, Jan -- System Information: Debian Release: 13.4 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.12.85+deb13-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages libtls-dev depends on: ii libtls28t64 3.8.1-2.1+b2 libtls-dev recommends no packages. libtls-dev suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-05-07 11:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MS3do-3f68-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1292583 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On May 07, Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> wrote: >An update of libtls-dev to the last stable upstream release 4.2.1 of libtls. Where would this upstream be? -- ciao, Marco
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-05-07 11:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MS3n3-3f9K-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1292601 |
On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 11:20:14AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On May 07, Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> wrote: > > An update of libtls-dev to the last stable upstream release 4.2.1 of libtls. > Where would this upstream be? The portable version can be found on libressl.org. Download links are here: https://www.libressl.org/releases.html Thanks, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-05-07 11:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MS3wJ-3feE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1292602 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On May 07, Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> wrote: >On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 11:20:14AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: >> On May 07, Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> wrote: >> > An update of libtls-dev to the last stable upstream release 4.2.1 of libtls. >> Where would this upstream be? >The portable version can be found on libressl.org. >Download links are here: https://www.libressl.org/releases.html But that is the full libressl, which will not be packaged for Debian. libretls here is a derivative with a different upstream: https://git.causal.agency/libretls/ . -- ciao, Marco
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-05-07 13:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MS4VP-3guj-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1292603 |
On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 11:38:42AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On May 07, Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> wrote: > > On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 11:20:14AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > > On May 07, Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> wrote: > > > > An update of libtls-dev to the last stable upstream release 4.2.1 of libtls. > > > Where would this upstream be? > > The portable version can be found on libressl.org. > > Download links are here: https://www.libressl.org/releases.html > But that is the full libressl, which will not be packaged for Debian. Yes, libtls is part of libressl and libtls can also run with openssl. > libretls here is a derivative with a different upstream: > https://git.causal.agency/libretls/ . Ah. I thought this was the source of the libtls-dev packet: https://salsa.debian.org/md/libretls The import.sh script imports the libtls parts of the libressl.tar.gz file, without the rest of libressl. Bye, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-05-07 13:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MS5oR-3gJu-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1292651 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On May 07, Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> wrote: >> libretls here is a derivative with a different upstream: >> https://git.causal.agency/libretls/ . >Ah. I thought this was the source of the libtls-dev packet: >https://salsa.debian.org/md/libretls This is the source of the *Debian* package. You need to take this to the upstream maintainer, who apparently has abandoned the project. I will not work on the upstream package myself. -- ciao, Marco
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-05-07 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MS5Id-3h7U-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1292654 |
On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 01:47:11PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On May 07, Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> wrote: > > > > libretls here is a derivative with a different upstream: > > > https://git.causal.agency/libretls/ . > > Ah. I thought this was the source of the libtls-dev packet: > > https://salsa.debian.org/md/libretls > This is the source of the *Debian* package. > > You need to take this to the upstream maintainer, who apparently has > abandoned the project. I will not work on the upstream package myself. Sure. I created an account on salsa and would try to do the upgrade in a fork of salsa.debian.org/md/libretls. I just started this bugreport cause of hint from another debian maintainer. Or do you prefer another procedure?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-05-07 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MS5Id-3h7U-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1292583 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On May 07, Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> wrote: >Sure. I created an account on salsa and would try to do the upgrade in >a fork of salsa.debian.org/md/libretls. I just started this bugreport >cause of hint from another debian maintainer. You still do not understand: I am not looking for somebody to help with the Debian package, which is as fine as it can be. You need to talk to the UPSTREAM maintainer to understand if they are still interested in maintaining and updating this or not. If not, the options are: - we leave everything as it is (you have not explained why you need a newer version of libtls) - somebody steps up to maintain libtls upstream - somebody finds a way to keep packaging libtls out of the "main" libretls package -- ciao, Marco
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-05-07 15:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MS77j-3i1y-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1292661 |
On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 02:07:52PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On May 07, Jan Klemkow <j.klemkow@wemelug.de> wrote: > > > Sure. I created an account on salsa and would try to do the upgrade in > > a fork of salsa.debian.org/md/libretls. I just started this bugreport > > cause of hint from another debian maintainer. > You still do not understand: I am not looking for somebody to help with the > Debian package, which is as fine as it can be. > You need to talk to the UPSTREAM maintainer to understand if they are still > interested in maintaining and updating this or not. done. But, I'm not sure if I'll get an anwser here. > If not, the options are: > - we leave everything as it is (you have not explained why you need a > newer version of libtls) The libtls API was extended over the last years. > - somebody steps up to maintain libtls upstream I'm willing to do so and to be clear, it was not my attempt to dump this work on your desk. I would do this here: https://salsa.debian.org/younix/libretls if its fine for you? > - somebody finds a way to keep packaging libtls out of the "main" libretls > package As I already said, the import.sh script seems to do this.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web