Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1283397
| From | Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.qa |
| Subject | Bug#884135: qa.debian.org: UDD should honor comment-only watch file |
| Date | 2026-02-24 02:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <MrPIJ-2RK2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uVCyJ-1nB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <uVCyJ-1nB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi! [ CCing Lucas for UDD, and Christoph for DDPO. ] On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 20:59:55 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Multiple of my packages do not have a proper URL to watch. Lintian suggest to > add a watch file with comments, and uscan handles those gracefully. UDD > turns them into an error on line 106 in rimporters/upstream.rb. > > Please improve UDD to treat "empty" watch files as they are meant to be by > people that follow Lintian's advice. I think using the new watch format 5 with its "Untrackable:" field support is probably a more explicit way to handle this, which is what I've switched the couple of packages that I maintain that are in this same situation. To try to improve this I tried to modify both UDD and DDPO, to track and show these as a new status, and show on DDPO in gray to avoid creating the current alarming red upper-case entries, which seem wrong given that I don't think these packages should be worse-off than ones with no watch file included. The attached two patches try to implement this, but they are completely untested. I guess the one in UDD could be massaged to also include the watch format 4 with only comments (originally requested in this report), by checking in the same if/else case that none of the fields are present (given that the previous cases handle non-existing watch file). (I've also provided an MR for lintian updating its recommendation to use format 5 with <https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/668>) Thanks, Guillem
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next | Find similar
Bug#884135: qa.debian.org: UDD should honor comment-only watch file Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2026-02-24 02:50 +0100
csiph-web