Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1291385
| From | Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#1116004: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#1116004: marked as done (fonts-noto-core: Request to ship WOFF2 variants of NotoSans.) |
| Date | 2026-04-29 07:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MP5ln-1cWf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <MP5ln-1cWf-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <LxWJH-hpj2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MP5ln-1cWf-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <LxWJH-hpj2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MP5ln-1cWf-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Control: reopen -1 ! Control: severity -1 serious I think is wrong for fonts-noto to provide a binary package containing only a synthesized variation for a minor subset of its fonts. I find it wrong to go ahead and introduce such new package without discussion. I think the right cause of action now is to revert that change and drop the newly introduced binary package fonts-noto-web. Raising severity to avoid the package change to reach testing. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Bug#1116004: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#1116004: marked as done (fonts-noto-core: Request to ship WOFF2 variants of NotoSans.) Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2026-04-29 07:10 +0200 Bug#1116004: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#1116004: marked as done (fonts-noto-core: Request to ship WOFF2 variants of NotoSans.) Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2026-04-30 07:30 +0200
csiph-web