Re: ext4 reserved block count

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Enrico Bianchi <enrico.bianchi@ymail.com>
Newsgroups	it.comp.os.linux.sys
Subject	Re: ext4 reserved block count
Date	Sat, 25 Jan 2025 00:07:17 -0000 (UTC)
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	11
Message-ID	<slrnvp8apl.35ve.enrico.bianchi@fermi.ss3.it> (permalink)
References	<2uuv5l-5t5.ln1@lazy.lzy>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Injection-Date	Sat, 25 Jan 2025 01:07:18 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info	dont-email.me; posting-host="bbfcde717cb052b23f56eae449d65e42"; logging-data="2604623"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19u5PcYT/xSIvanKmnH4Jk1"
User-Agent	slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:+NI8tuGs6BSaW97y2feTyI+7oDU=
Xref	csiph.com it.comp.os.linux.sys:45368

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2025-01-19, Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> wrote:

> ha
> senso avere un "reserved block count"
> maggiore di zero?

No, quel valore ha senso averlo dove è la root, per gli altri dischi non
serve a molto. Detto questo, valuta se non ti convenga usare NTFS, se
stiamo parlando di un disco esterno

Enrico

Back to it.comp.os.linux.sys | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

ext4 reserved block count Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2025-01-19 20:04 +0100
  Re: ext4 reserved block count sm <carotone@test.it> - 2025-01-20 13:55 +0000
  Re: ext4 reserved block count Enrico Bianchi <enrico.bianchi@ymail.com> - 2025-01-25 00:07 +0000
  Re: ext4 reserved block count Giuseppe Della Bianca <giusdbgNO@gmailNO.comNO> - 2025-01-25 15:41 +0000
    Re: ext4 reserved block count sm <carotone@test.it> - 2025-01-25 22:04 +0000

csiph-web