Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.groff.bug > #1742 > unrolled thread

[bug #57510] not all TTY output controls simultaneously available (nroff needs -P)

Started by"G. Branden Robinson" <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org>
First post2020-02-10 06:16 -0500
Last post2020-02-10 06:16 -0500
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.groff.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [bug #57510] not all TTY output controls simultaneously available (nroff needs -P) "G. Branden Robinson" <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org> - 2020-02-10 06:16 -0500

#1742 — [bug #57510] not all TTY output controls simultaneously available (nroff needs -P)

From"G. Branden Robinson" <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org>
Date2020-02-10 06:16 -0500
Subject[bug #57510] not all TTY output controls simultaneously available (nroff needs -P)
Message-ID<mailman.599.1581333383.2412.bug-groff@gnu.org>
Update of bug #57510 (project groff):

                  Status:               Need Info => In Progress            

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #19:

[comment #18 comment #18:]
> New patch looks good to me.

Thanks, Dave!

> Just two nitpicks about the nroff.1.man changes:
> 
> * Is "-P post-proc-option" the best way to say that?  nroff's postprocessor
will always be grotty, right?  Maybe "-P grotty-option" reinforces this more?

I think learning to associate "-P" with "(p)ostprocessor" is better pedagogy. 
However, I'm emphasizing that grotty is always nroff's postprocessor in the
NEWS item for this change.

> * I'd prefer to see the page explicitly state that -h and -c are respective
aliases for -P-h and -P-c.  By leaving this unstated, a user unfamiliar with
the history of how we got here might reasonably (and erroneously) infer that
because these two options are treated specially, there must be something
different about these two different ways to specify them.

That's fair.  I've added language for this as briefly as I could to the man
page, and also noted it in the NEWS item.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57510>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.groff.bug


csiph-web