Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.groff.bug > #1738 > unrolled thread

[bug #57510] not all TTY output controls simultaneously available (nroff needs -P)

Started byDave <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org>
First post2020-02-10 01:15 -0500
Last post2020-02-10 01:15 -0500
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.groff.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [bug #57510] not all TTY output controls simultaneously available (nroff needs -P) Dave <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org> - 2020-02-10 01:15 -0500

#1738 — [bug #57510] not all TTY output controls simultaneously available (nroff needs -P)

FromDave <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org>
Date2020-02-10 01:15 -0500
Subject[bug #57510] not all TTY output controls simultaneously available (nroff needs -P)
Message-ID<mailman.581.1581315326.2412.bug-groff@gnu.org>
Follow-up Comment #18, bug #57510 (project groff):

New patch looks good to me.  Just two nitpicks about the nroff.1.man changes:

* Is "-P post-proc-option" the best way to say that?  nroff's postprocessor
will always be grotty, right?  Maybe "-P grotty-option" reinforces this more?

* I'd prefer to see the page explicitly state that -h and -c are respective
aliases for -P-h and -P-c.  By leaving this unstated, a user unfamiliar with
the history of how we got here might reasonably (and erroneously) infer that
because these two options are treated specially, there must be something
different about these two different ways to specify them.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57510>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.groff.bug


csiph-web