Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.groff.bug > #1888 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ingo Schwarze <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-06-25 15:08 -0400 |
| Last post | 2020-06-25 15:08 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.groff.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[bug #58653] Please add back in the mdoc(7) manual Ingo Schwarze <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org> - 2020-06-25 15:08 -0400
| From | Ingo Schwarze <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-06-25 15:08 -0400 |
| Subject | [bug #58653] Please add back in the mdoc(7) manual |
| Message-ID | <mailman.441.1593112089.2574.bug-groff@gnu.org> |
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #58653 (project groff):
> I had thought you were linking to the mdoc documentation that comes with
BSD.
mandoc is portable software. It is included and used by default in these
systems (chronological order by first official use): OpenBSD, NetBSD, Illumos,
Void Linux, FreeBSD, Alpine Linux. Official packages exist for Debian,
Gentoo, and Fedora, among others; on Fedora, making it the default manual page
viewer is an officially supported option. I just used the OpenBSD link out of
habit and because it's the most carefully maintained manual page server
carrying it. These are quite similar:
https://mandoc.bsd.lv/man/mdoc.7.html
https://man.bsd.lv/mdoc.7
https://manpages.debian.org/buster/mandoc/mandoc_mdoc.7.en.html
https://man.voidlinux.org/man7/mdoc.7
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=mdoc
> I do think it is unfortunate that people who use groff
> on non-BSD systems are left poorer, without even
> a pointer to better documentation.
I wouldn't say either is absolutely better, it's mostly the same content in
somewhat different style. But your idea of adding pointers to each other in
the SEE ALSO sections on both sides sounds good, so people can more easily
find both and pick one according to which style they prefer. Let's see
whether i can get those two links in on both sides.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58653>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
Back to top | Article view | gnu.groff.bug
csiph-web