Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.groff.bug > #1905 > unrolled thread

[bug #58736] -me macros: footnote breaks two-column output

Started byDave <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org>
First post2020-07-18 15:35 -0400
Last post2020-07-18 15:35 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.groff.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [bug #58736] -me macros: footnote breaks two-column output Dave <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org> - 2020-07-18 15:35 -0400

#1905 — [bug #58736] -me macros: footnote breaks two-column output

FromDave <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org>
Date2020-07-18 15:35 -0400
Subject[bug #58736] -me macros: footnote breaks two-column output
Message-ID<mailman.37.1595100908.24492.bug-groff@gnu.org>
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #58736 (project groff):

The footnoted input file produces the same incorrect PostScript output in
Heirloom troff, and the unfootnoted one produces the same correct PostScript
output.  (Heirloom nroff output from both input files is pretty hopelessly
broken.)

According to the header blocks of the respective files, groff's -me macros are
forked from version 2.31 of Eric Allman's original set, and Heirloom's from
version 2.14.  If there's a repository of these versions of the -me package as
they existed before forking, I can't find it.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58736>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.groff.bug


csiph-web