Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.groff.bug > #1649 > unrolled thread

[bug #57618] man/groff_char.7.man: page needs an overhaul

Started by"G. Branden Robinson" <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org>
First post2020-01-17 23:16 -0500
Last post2020-01-17 23:16 -0500
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.groff.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [bug #57618] man/groff_char.7.man: page needs an overhaul "G. Branden Robinson" <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org> - 2020-01-17 23:16 -0500

#1649 — [bug #57618] man/groff_char.7.man: page needs an overhaul

From"G. Branden Robinson" <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org>
Date2020-01-17 23:16 -0500
Subject[bug #57618] man/groff_char.7.man: page needs an overhaul
Message-ID<mailman.2842.1579321017.1979.bug-groff@gnu.org>
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #57618 (project groff):

Other things being equal, I lean toward getting rid of the PostScript column
or, more precisely, moving it to the grops(1) page.  (I'd have gropdf(1) just
direct the reader to grops(1) for the glyph list with PostScript names.  Now's
the time to tell me if/how PDF glyph names are incompatible with, or extend,
PostScript names.)

The main thing stopping me at this point is the DRY principle.  The groff
glyph list should probably maintained external to both pages and inlined into
each, with columns appropriate to the page.

But that would mean that groff_char.7.man and grops.1.man need to become .in
files, and bleah.

A bit of tedium.  But not insuperable.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57618>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.groff.bug


csiph-web