Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.groff.bug > #1709 > unrolled thread

[bug #57622] [PATCH] doc-old.tmac-u: Remove a superfluous "end of a macro" (..)

Started by"G. Branden Robinson" <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org>
First post2020-02-04 02:36 -0500
Last post2020-02-04 02:36 -0500
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.groff.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [bug #57622] [PATCH] doc-old.tmac-u: Remove a superfluous "end of a macro" (..) "G. Branden Robinson" <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org> - 2020-02-04 02:36 -0500

#1709 — [bug #57622] [PATCH] doc-old.tmac-u: Remove a superfluous "end of a macro" (..)

From"G. Branden Robinson" <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org>
Date2020-02-04 02:36 -0500
Subject[bug #57622] [PATCH] doc-old.tmac-u: Remove a superfluous "end of a macro" (..)
Message-ID<mailman.254.1580801769.2412.bug-groff@gnu.org>
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #57622 (project groff):

I'm not sure I agree with this being closed.

My opinion:

The GNU roff codebase is not supposed to be a museum.

Our macro packages should exhibit exemplary style (literally, serve as good
examples) insofar as we are aware and able to make them.

If there is more value in keeping mdoc-old frozen as an exhibit than in
serving as macro package for formatting documents even if the user has the
warnings dialed way the hell up, then I submit that it would be better to drop
it from the groff distribution.  Let other implementations be in the
archaeological exhibit business.  Certainly there are plenty of moribund
SourceForge, GitHub, and even Apache Software Foundation projects
(<cough>Apache Open Office</cough>) fitting this description.

My preference would be to re-open the ticket and fix it.

Ingo and I have weighed in; would anyone else like to?

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57622>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.groff.bug


csiph-web