Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.groff.bug > #1908 > unrolled thread

[bug #58736] -me macros: footnote breaks two-column output

Started byDave <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org>
First post2020-07-20 06:40 -0400
Last post2020-07-20 06:40 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.groff.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [bug #58736] -me macros: footnote breaks two-column output Dave <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org> - 2020-07-20 06:40 -0400

#1908 — [bug #58736] -me macros: footnote breaks two-column output

FromDave <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org>
Date2020-07-20 06:40 -0400
Subject[bug #58736] -me macros: footnote breaks two-column output
Message-ID<mailman.212.1595241638.24492.bug-groff@gnu.org>
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #58736 (project groff):

Replying to myself:

[comment #5 comment #5:]
> Savannah unfortunately requires -me bugs be categorized under
> "Macro - others," so it's hard to tell how many are filed here.
> I've opened at least eight

I realize my prolific bug-opening is skewing these results, but for
comparison, currently mm has 8 open bugs, ms 4, man 7, mdoc 6, and mom 1.  By
those numbers, adding a specific -me category to savannah seems justified. 
-me is also the only full-service macro package lacking its own category.

> ones like this one and bug #58447, where merely describing how
> to trigger them requires an essay.

Perhaps a better thing for the -me documentation to include than complete
descriptions of these bugs is links to the savannah bug reports still open at
the time of the release.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58736>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.groff.bug


csiph-web