Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.groff.bug > #1991 > unrolled thread

[bug #51003] "test-groff" can't find doc-macros in the "tmac/mdoc" directory

Started by"G. Branden Robinson" <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org>
First post2020-08-25 04:40 -0400
Last post2020-08-25 04:40 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.groff.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [bug #51003] "test-groff" can't find doc-macros in the "tmac/mdoc" directory "G. Branden Robinson" <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org> - 2020-08-25 04:40 -0400

#1991 — [bug #51003] "test-groff" can't find doc-macros in the "tmac/mdoc" directory

From"G. Branden Robinson" <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org>
Date2020-08-25 04:40 -0400
Subject[bug #51003] "test-groff" can't find doc-macros in the "tmac/mdoc" directory
Message-ID<mailman.1107.1598344831.2469.bug-groff@gnu.org>
Update of bug #51003 (project groff):

             Open/Closed:                    Open => Closed                 
         Planned Release:                    None => 1.22.5                 

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #10:

This has been discussed on the development list multiple times over the years,
and no one objected to the idea of fixing it on principle.

There were basically two ways to fix it:

1. Make the installation tree look more like the build tree, with all the
doc-* macro files in the same directory.

2. Make the build tree look more like the installation tree, with the
"modules" of the mdoc package in an mdoc/ subdirectory of tmac/.

I went with option 2.  Churn for the dev team is less objectionable than churn
for users, and besides I think it is a good idea to reinforce by example the
notion that a macro package need not be implemented as a flat hierarchy. 
Option 1 would not have done this.

Also, now this problem is in my way.  See bug #58992.

Fixed in de1e4091311d74ab2af19aa0d376c5d228a14280.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51003>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.groff.bug


csiph-web